电视胸腹腔镜下与传统开胸手术治疗食管癌的疗效对比分析

Effect contrast of thoracoscopic surgery and conventional thoracotomy lobectomy for esophageal carcinoma

目的研究外科手术治疗食管癌中电视胸腹腔镜下和传统开胸手术两种方法的疗效。方法选取于该院胸外科治疗的中老年食管癌,根据手术治疗方法不同分为腔镜组和开胸组,记录病理诊断结果、手术一般情况及术后住院时间和并发症。结果腔镜组在术中出血量较少,术后住院时间短,并发症发生更少,与开胸组相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论电视胸腹腔镜手术治疗食管癌安全性高,疗效肯定,值得广泛研究和推广。

Objective To detect the contrast of vido‐assisted thoracic surgery （VATS） and conventional thoracotomy lobectomy for esophageal carcinoma .Methods 30 cases advanced esophageal carcinoma were selected in our hospital and divided into VATS group and thoracotomy group ,recorded pathological diagnosis ,operation and postoperative hospital stay and complications .Results VATS group had less bleeding ,shorter postoperative hospital stay ,less complications ,there was significant differences compared with thoracotomy group .Conclusion VATS in the treatment of advanced esophageal carcinoma have high safety ,definite curative effect ,and is worthy of extensive research and extension.