期刊文献+

基于动态损失厌恶投资组合模型的最优资产配置与实证研究 被引量:22

Optimal Asset Allocation Based on Dynamic Loss Aversion Portfolio Model and Empirical Research
原文传递
导出
摘要 从行为金融学的角度考虑投资者损失厌恶的心理特征,建立预期效用最大化的动态损失厌恶投资组合优化模型。以我国股票市场为依托,将市场分为上升、下降和盘整三种状态,研究动态损失厌恶投资组合模型的最优资产配置和绩效表现,并与静态损失厌恶投资组合模型、M-V投资组合模型和CVaR投资组合模型进行比较。最后,在具有交易成本的条件下对动态模型进行稳健性检验。得出结论:不同情况下,动态损失厌恶投资者具有不同的最优资产配置比例,且动态损失厌恶投资组合模型明显优于静态模型、M-V投资组合模型和CVaR投资组合模型。 Considering the psychological characteristics of loss aversion from the perspective of behavioral finance, a dynamic loss aversion portfolio optimization model that maximizes the expected utility is con- structed. Dividing China^s stock market into three states including rise, decline and consolidation, we em- pirically study the optimal asset allocation and performance of the dynamic loss aversion portfolio model is empirically studied comparing it with static loss aversion portfolio model as well as mean-variance and CVaR portfolio models. It is found under different market conditions, dynamic loss aversion investors have different optimal asset allocation ratios. Meanwhile, dynamic loss aversion portfolio model clearly outper- forms static model, mean-variance portfolio model and CVaR portfolio model. The conclusions above can provide investors with advice when making investment decisions.
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第5期16-23,共8页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70771023)
关键词 动态损失厌恶 资产配置 稳健性检验 前景理论 dynamic loss aversion asset allocation robust test prospect theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献35

  • 1张艳英,张苹苹,张池平.病态方程组的一种精确解法[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,1995,27(6):26-28. 被引量:12
  • 2Markowitz, H.. Portfolio selection [J]. Journal of Finance,1952, 7(1) :77-91.
  • 3Sharpe, W.. Expected utility asset allocation [R]. Working paper, Stanford university, 2006.
  • 4Merton, R. Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty : The continuous time case [J]. Review of Econometics and Statistics, 1969, 51(3) : 247-257.
  • 5Lucas, R. E.. Asset prices in an exchange economy [J]. Econometrica, 1978,46(6) : 1429- 1445.
  • 6Kahneman, D. , Tversky, A.. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk [J]. Econometrica, 1979,47 (2) : 263-292.
  • 7Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty [J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992, 5 (4): 297- 323.
  • 8Cremers, J. , Kritzman, M.. Optimal hedge fund allocat-ions [J]. Journal of Portfolio Management, 2005,31 (3) :70-81.
  • 9Adler, T. , Kritzman, M.. Mean-variance versus Fullscale Optimization: in and out of Sample [J]. Journal of Asset Management, 2007,7(5) :302-311.
  • 10HagstrAomerB. , Binner J. Stock selection with fullscale optimization and differential evolution[J]. Applied Financial Economics, 2009,19(19) :1559- 1571.

共引文献31

同被引文献295

引证文献22

二级引证文献125

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部