期刊文献+

Receiver-Controlled Multi-Node Cooperation

Receiver-Controlled Multi-Node Cooperation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Since wireless links in Ad hoc networks are more fragile than those in traditional wireless networks due to route flapping,multi-node cooperation plays an important role in ensuring the quality of service( QoS). Based on the authors' previous work,this paper proposes a receiver-controlled multi-node cooperation routing protocol,known as AODV-RCC. In this protocol,nodes form a cooperation group based on signal power. In a cooperation group,signal power between a partner and a transmitter,as well as signal power between the partner and the receiver,must be larger than the signal power between the transmitter and the receiver. Otherwise,the transmission will not benefit from cooperation. To avoid collision or congestion,each cooperation group only contains one partner. This partner offers both data and ACK cooperative retransmission. Its retransmission time should be shorter than the internal retry time of the transmitter's MAC layer,because it is better for the partner to retransmit firstly,as it offers a more reliable cooperative link. In AODV-RCC,it is the receiver that chooses the partner,because the link between the partner and the receiver is the most important. According to our simulation results,AODV-RCC shortens the end-to-end delay and increases the packet delivery ratio. Since wireless links in Ad hoc networks are more fragile than those in traditional wireless networks due to route flapping, multi-node cooperation plays an important role in ensuring the quality of service (QoS). Based on the authors' previous work, this paper proposes a receiver-controlled multi-node cooperation routing protocol, known as AODV-RCC. In this protocol, nodes form a cooperation group based on signal power. In a cooperation group, signal power between a partner and a transmitter, as well as signal power between the partner and the receiver, must be larger than the signal power between the transmitter and the receiver. Otherwise, the transmission will not benefit from cooperation. To avoid collision or congestion, each cooperation group only contains one partner. This partner offers both data and ACK cooperative retransmission. Its retransmission time should be shorter than the internal retry time of the transmitter' s MAC layer, because it is better for the partner to retransmit firstly, as it offers a more reliable cooperative link. In AODV-RCC, it is the receiver that chooses the partner, because the link between the partner and the receiver is the most important. According to our simulation results, AODV-RCC shortens the end-to-end delay and increases the packet delivery ratio.
出处 《Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology(New Series)》 EI CAS 2014年第2期6-12,共7页 哈尔滨工业大学学报(英文版)
基金 Sponsored by the Natural Scientific Research Innovation Foundation in Harbin Institute of Technology(Grant No.HIT.NSRIF.2013029) the National Science and Technology Major Project(Grant No.2012ZX03004003) the National Basic Research Development Program of China(973 Program)(Grant No.2013CB329003) the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.61201148 and No.61101123)
关键词 multi-node cooperation receiver-controlled routing protocol Ad hoc network multi-node cooperation receiver-controlled routing protocol Ad hoc network
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Benmoshe B, Berliner E, Dvir A. Performance monitoring framework for Wi-Fi MANET. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC). Piscataway: IEEE Communications Society, 2013. 4463-4468.
  • 2Bansal A. Singh M. Enhancing MANET's performance: A transport layer solution. Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Parallel Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC). Piscataway: IEEE, 2012. 272-277.
  • 3Kant K, Awasthi L K. Stable link based muhicast routing scheme for MANET. Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (CICN). Piscataway: IEEE, 2010. 296-300.
  • 4Li Y, Zhang Z, Wang C, et al. Blind cooperative communications for Multi-hop Ad Hoc wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2013,62 (7) : 3110-3122.
  • 5Jing Yinan, Yang Song, Wang Xueping, et al. 802. l l- Based Multihop Ad Hoc Network Implementation. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on WirelessCommunications, Networking and Mobile Computing. Washington DC: IEEE Computer Society, 2008. 1-4.
  • 6Ruan Jiayong. Cross-Layer Design for QoS Guarantee in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2005. 36.
  • 7Chen Chao, Zheng Baoyu, Zhao Xianjing. An Ad Hoc cooperative routing algorithm based on optimal channel selection. Journal of Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications (Natural Science), 2007, 27( 1): 51 -55.
  • 8Ye Liang, Sha Xuejun, Xu Yubin. Route maintenance against route flapping in Ad hoc networks. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2010, 40(5) : 1397-1403.
  • 9Ye Liang, Chen Deying, Sha Xuejun. Multi-node- cooperative AODV based on cross-layer. Proceedings of the 6th International ICST Conferenee on Communications and Networking in China. Piseataway: IEEE, 2011. 350-355.N.
  • 10agao K, Kadowaki Y, Yamao Y. Multi-hop transmission performance of cognitive temporary bypassing for wireless Ad Hoc networks. Proceedings of the Consumer Communications and Networking Conference. Piscataway: IEEE, 2009. 1-5.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部