期刊文献+

大学生星座相信程度与巴纳姆效应关系分析

下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究用Forer范式作为试验材料,使大学生观看人格报告后检测其准确性,并测量其星座相信程度。结果表明,大学生认为人格报告的内容准确,巴纳姆效应的程度较高,不存在性别差异,在相信星座程度上存在性别差异。巴纳姆效应和星座相信程度与星座都没有关系。巴纳姆效应与星座相信程度呈正相关。
作者 彭梓林
出处 《校园心理》 2014年第3期170-172,共3页 Journal of Campus Life & Mental Health
关键词 人格 学生 偏差
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献11

  • 1Clark D, Gabries T. Barnes J. Astrological signs as determinants of extroversion and emotionality: An empirical study. The Journal of Psychology, 1996, 130(2): 131-140
  • 2Eysenck H J, Nias D B. Astrology, science or superstition London: Maurice Temple Smith, 1982
  • 3Glick P, Gottesman D, Jolton J. The fault is not in the stars: Susceptibility of skeptics and believers in astrology to the Barnum effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1989, 15(4): 572-583
  • 4Hamilton M M. Incorporation of astrology-based personality information into long-term self-concept. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1995, 10(3): 707-718
  • 5Mayo J, White O. Eysenck H J.An empirical study of the relation between astrological factors and personality. Journal of Social Psychology, 1978, 105(2): 229-236
  • 6Seider R. Is the future in your stars Australasian Science, 2001, 12(1): 38
  • 7Silverman B. Studies of astrology. Journal of Psychology, 1971(2): 141-149
  • 8Smithers A G, Cooper H J. Personality and season of birth. Journal of Social Psychology, 1978, 105(2): 237-241
  • 9Snyder C R. Why horoscopes are true: The effects of specificity on acceptance of astrological interpretations. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1974, 30(4): 577-580
  • 10Snyder C R, Larsen D L, Bloom L J. Acceptance of general personality interpretations prior to and after receipt of diagnostic feedback supposedly based on psychological, graphological, and astrological assessment procedures. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1976, 32(2): 258-265

共引文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部