期刊文献+

情绪影响风险决策的ERP研究:以愉悦和愤怒为例 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文采用事件相关电位(ERP)方法探讨愉悦和愤怒两种典型情绪如何影响风险决策过程,比较两种情绪诱发后的风险决策脑成分N200和P300。结果发现:(1)情绪确实影响风险选择,被试在愉悦情绪和愤怒情绪下做出同样的冒险选择,说明在行为上两种情绪对选择结果的影响相同;(2)愤怒情绪比愉悦情绪在决策时能诱发出更高的N200和P300波幅,说明在愤怒情绪下做出选择需要更多的认知控制,愤怒情绪使大脑认知加工过程有更多的情绪因素卷入因而更难以控制;(3)N200和P300的潜伏期在两种情绪条件下的差异不显著,这或许说明在愤怒和愉悦情绪作用下大脑进行风险决策加工的过程和速度具有一致性。结论:愉悦和愤怒情绪均会使人做出风险偏好的决策,而愤怒情绪使人做决策时有更多的情绪卷入,常常做出非理性的冒险决策。
作者 张文秀 李夏
出处 《消费导刊》 2014年第5期28-30,34,共4页
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Johnson E J, TverskyA, Affect,generalization,and the perception of risk[J], Journal of personality and Social psychology, 1983,45: 20-31.
  • 2Isen A M, Patrik R. The effects of positive feelings on risk- taking: when the chips are down[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1983,31: 194-202.
  • 3Nygren T E, Isen,A M, Taylor P J, et al. The influence of Positive affect on the decision rule in risk situations: focus on outeome (and especially avoidance of loss) rather than Probability[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision processes, 1996.66 (1):59-72.
  • 4Raghunathan P, Pham M T. All Negative Moods Are Not Equal: Motivational Influences of Anxiety and Sadness on Decision Making[J]. Anxiety sadness and decision making, 1999,79(1): 56-77.
  • 5Js Lerner,D Keltner. Fear, anger and risk[J], Journal of personality and social psychology, 2001,81 ; 146-159:.
  • 6Yuen K S L, Lee T M. Could mood state affect risk-taking decision[J]. Journal of Affeetive Disorders, 2003, 75: 11 -18.
  • 7Williams S. Wong We Voon Y. The effects of mood on managerial risk perceptions: Exploring affect and the dimensions of risk[J]. Journal of Social Psychology, 1999, 139( 3): 268-288.
  • 8Leith K P, Baumeister R F. Why do bad moods increase self- defeating behavior? Emotion, risk and self-regulation[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996, 71: 1250-1267.
  • 9Hermosillo R., Ritterband-Rosenbaum A, Donkelaar P V. Predicting Future Sensorimotor States Influences Current Temporal Decision Making[J]. The Journal of Neuroscience, 2011,31(27) 100l 9-10022.
  • 10Kahn,Y Yeshurun, P Rotshtein, et al. The Role of the Amygdala in Signaling Prospective Outcome of Choice[J], 2002, 33:983-994.

二级参考文献59

  • 1白露,马慧,黄宇霞,罗跃嘉.中国情绪图片系统的编制——在46名中国大学生中的试用[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2005,19(11):719-722. 被引量:310
  • 2陈俊,贺晓玲,张积家.反事实思维两大理论:范例说和目标-指向说[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(3):416-422. 被引量:31
  • 3Labouvie-Vief G. Dynamic integration, Affect, cognition, and the self in adulthood[J]. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2003.12(6) :201-206.
  • 4Gross J J, Levenson R W. Emotion elicitation using films[J]. Cognition and Emotion, 1995,9 (1) : 87-108.
  • 5Philippot Pierre. Inducing and assessing differentiated emotion-feeling states in the laboratory[J]. Cognition and Emotion, 1993,7 (2): 171 - 193.
  • 6Lerner J S, Kelther D. Fear, anger, and risk[J]. Journal of personality and social psychology, 2001, 81(1) :146-159.
  • 7Lerner J S,Tiedens L Z. Portrait of the angry decision maker: how appraisal tendencies shape anger's influence on cognition[J]. Journal of behavioral decision making. 2006,19 : 115-137.
  • 8Fessler D M T,Pillsworth E G,Flamson T J. Angey men and disgusted women. An evolutionary approach to the influence of emotions on risk taking [J]. Organational behavior and human decision processes. 2004,95 (1) : 107-123.
  • 9Carstensen L L, Isaacowitz D M, Charles S T. Taking time seriously. A theory of socioemotional selectivity [J]. American Psychologist, 1999,54(3) : 165-181.
  • 10Gehring W J, Willoughby A R. The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science, 2002, 295: 2279-2282.

共引文献30

同被引文献63

  • 1Mata R, Nunes L. When less is enough: Cognitive aging, information search, and decision quality in consumer choice. Psychology and Aging , 2010, 25 (2) : 289-298 DOI:10.1037/a0017927.
  • 2Peters E, Dieckmann N F, Weller J. Age differences in complex decision making//Schaie K W, Willis S L. Handbook of the Psychology of Aging.7th. Oxford: Elsevier Inc , 2011 : 133-148.
  • 3Lockenhoff C E, Carstensen L L. Aging, emotion, and health-related decision strategies: Motivational manipulations can reduce age differences. Psychology and Aging , 2007, 22 (1) : 134-146 DOI:10.1037/0882-7974.22.1.134.
  • 4English T, Carstensen L L. Does positivity operate when the stakes are high? Health status and decision making among older adults. Psychology and Aging , 2015, 30 (2) : 348-355 DOI:10.1037/a0039121.
  • 5Schwarz N, Clore G L. Feelings and phenomenal experiences// Kruglanski A, Higgins E T. Social psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles. 2nd. New York: Guilford, 2007, 2: 385-407.
  • 6Lang P J, Bradley M M, Cuthbert B N. International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Instruction Manual and Affective Ratings. US: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida, 1999.
  • 7Hess T M. Selective engagement of cognitive resources motivational influences on older adults' cognitive functioning. Perspectives on Psychological Science , 2014, 9 (4) : 388-407 DOI:10.1177/1745691614527465.
  • 8Mata R, Von Helversen B, Rieskamp J. Learning to choose: cognitive aging and strategy selection learning in decision making. Psychology and Aging , 2010, 25 (2) : 299-309 DOI:10.1037/a0018923.
  • 9Hanoch Y, Wood S, Barnes A, et al. Choosing the right medicare prescription drug plan: The effect of age, strategy selection, and choice set size. Health Psychology , 2011, 30 (6) : 719-727 DOI:10.1037/a0023951.
  • 10Hess T M, Queen T L, Ennis G E. Age and self-relevance effects on information search during decision making. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences , 2013, 68 (5) : 703-711 DOI:10.1093/geronb/gbs108.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部