期刊文献+

南京市高淳区高血压社区综合干预效果评价 被引量:6

Efficacy analysis of community-based comprehensive interventions on hypertension in Gaochun district of Nanjing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价南京市高血压社区综合干预效果。方法采用自编《高淳县社区慢性病管理效果评估调查问卷》,于2011年调查高血压患者3 990人,并分组进行综合干预管理,于基线调查后半年、1年进行随访。结果随访率分别为99.0%、98.9%。GEE分析结果表明,与基线调查相比,社区综合干预半年时,高血压患者收缩压、舒张压的平均下降值差异无统计学意义,血压控制率是基线时的1.138倍,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);综合干预1年,收缩压平均下降4.531mmHg,舒张压平均下降1.525mmHg,控制率是基线时的2.236倍,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);心血管事件发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论高血压社区综合干预1年,可有效降低患者的血压水平,提高血压控制率。 Objective To evaluate efficacy of community-based comprehensive interventions on hypertension in Nanjing. Methods Using self-designed Gaochun District Chronic Non-communicable Diseases Management Evaluation Questionnaire,a total of 3 990patients with hypertension were investigated in 2011,who were subjected to comprehensive intervention management in different groups.Follow-up surveys were conducted in half and 1year after baseline survey.Results Follow-up survey rate was 99.0%and 98.9%,respectively.GEE analysis revealed that compared to baseline survey,systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure of patients with hypertension dropped after 6months of comprehensive community-based interventions, no significant difference was observed.Blood pressure control rate was 1.138times of survey baseline,with significant difference(P〈.05).After 1-year comprehensive interventions,systolic blood pressure dropped by 4.531mmHg in average,while diastolic blood pressure dropped by 1.525mmHg in average,control rate was 2.236times of baseline survey,with significant difference(P〈.05).No significant difference was observed for morbidity of cardiovascular events(P〈.05).ConclusionsOne-year community-based comprehensive interventions for patients with hypertension reduced their blood pressure level and enhanced blood pressure control rate.
出处 《江苏预防医学》 CAS 2014年第3期28-30,共3页 Jiangsu Journal of Preventive Medicine
基金 世行贷款/英国赠款中国农村卫生项目(Loan No.7551-CN)
关键词 高血压 社区综合干预 效果评价 hypertension community-based comprehensive intervention efficacy analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献23

共引文献124

同被引文献56

  • 1石平,徐明,钱云.无锡市慢病试点高血压基线资料分析[J].江苏预防医学,2006,17(2):30-31. 被引量:2
  • 2杨小伶,刘先锋,刘达伟,张华东,向新志,赵舰.重庆市居民超重与肥胖现状及影响因素分析[J].中国公共卫生,2007,23(7):778-779. 被引量:30
  • 3徐燕,武呜,潘晓群.等.江苏省慢性病及其危险因素监测报告[M].南京:南京师范大学出版社,2010:21-31.
  • 4Larsson B. Obesity and body fat distribution as predictors of coronary heart disease [ M ]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992: 233- 241.
  • 5Thankappan KR, Sivasankaran S, Mini GK, et al. Impact of acommunity based intervention program on awareness, treatmentand control of hypertension in a rural Panchayat, Kerala, India[J]. Indian Heart J, 2013,65(5) ;504-509.
  • 6Wee LE, Wong J, Chin RT, et al. Hypertension management andlifestyle changes following screening for hypertension in an Asianlow socioeconomic status community : a prospective study [ J ].Ann Acad Med Singapore, 2013,42(9) :451-465.
  • 7Lin PH, Yancy WS Jr, Poliak KI, et al. The influence of a physi-cian and patient intervention program on dietary intake [ J ]. JAcad Nutr Diet, 2013,113(11):1465-1475.
  • 8Halladay JR, Donahue KE,Hinderliter AL, et al. The HeartHealthy Lenoir project-an intervention to reduce disparities in hy-pertension control . study protocol [ J ]. BMC Health Serv Res,2013,13:441.
  • 9Gudina EK, Michael Y, Assegid S. Prevalence of hypertensionand its risk factors in southwest Ethiopia : a hospital-based cross-sectional survey [ J]. Integr Blood Press Control, 2013,6: 111-117.
  • 10Lauzifere TA,Chevarie N,Poirier M,et al. Effects of an interdis-ciplinary education program on hypertension : A pilot study [ J ].Can J Cardiovasc Nurs, 2013,23(2) :12-19.

引证文献6

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部