期刊文献+

全美博士点质量评估体系探析及启示

Exploration and Enlightenment of the Quality Assessment of Doctoral Programs in the U.S.
原文传递
导出
摘要 近年来,随着我国博士生培养规模的进一步扩大,如何完善博士点质量评估体系、保障和提高博士点教育质量成为新的关注点。全美博士点质量评估体系具有多主体分工协作、综合反映师生多层次需求、针对性突出等特点,我国博士点质量评估体系的构建应借鉴全美博士点质量评估的成功经验,动员社会广泛参与,设置多层评估指标,增强评估的针对性。 In recent years, as the widening of doctoral education scale in our country, how to improve the quality assessment of doctoral programs with the purpose of ensuring and improving the quality of doctoral programs becomes the new focus. On the basis of summarizing the development of the Quality Assessment of Doctoral Programs in the U.S., this essay deep studied the Quality Assessment of Doctoral Programs in the U.S. (2006) in three dimensions: assessment agents, indicator system and target of assessment, discovers that the quality assessment system which focus on doctoral programs in American has few characteristics such as the multi-agent collaboration pattern, the multi-levelindicators which reflect hierarchical demand of teachers and students in doctoral programs, position-relevant of the assessment and so on. In the end, the essay offers relevant proposals associated with the construction and improvement of doctoral programs assessment in China.
出处 《中国高教研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期36-42,共7页 China Higher Education Research
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目"学生期望视角下的研究生教育质量保障研究"(项目批准号:2014BS06) 国家社科基金重大项目"中国城市社会来临与智慧城市设计及发展战略研究"(项目批准号:11&ZD154) 广东省普通高校人文社会科学研究重大攻关项目"我国研究生教育质量保障研究"(项目编号:11ZGXM88002)的研究成果之一
关键词 博士点质量评估 评估主题 指标体系 评估对象 assessment of doctoral programs assessment agents indicator system target of assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Freeman R E.Strategic Management:Stake-Holder Approach(Pitman Series in Business and Public Policy)[ M ].Boston:Harpercollins College Div,1984.
  • 2张存群,沈文钦.美国博士点质量评估方法的历史演变[J].高等教育研究,2010,31(7):71-76. 被引量:8
  • 3余瑞玲.美国博士点质量评估体系的发展历程及借鉴[J].现代教育科学(高教研究),2012(1):142-145. 被引量:1
  • 4William Colglazier E,Ostriker Jeremiah P.Counterpoint:Doctoral-Program Rankings the NRC Responds [ N ].Chronicle of Higher Educatioa,2010-10-17.
  • 5Shortridge Ashton,Goldsberry Kirk,Weessies Kathleen.Measuring Research Data Uncertainty in the 2010 NRC Assessment of Geography Graduate Education[J].Journal of Geography 2011(06):219-226.
  • 6Cole,Jonathan R.Too Big to Fail:How "better than nothing" defined the National Research Council's graduate rankings [ N ].Chronicle of Higher Education,2011-04-24.
  • 7Cartter A M,Sawyer R A.An assessment of quality in graduate education[J].Physics Today,1966(19):75.
  • 8Drew,Karpf.Ranking academic departments:Empirical findings and a theoretical perspective[J].Research in Higher Education,1981(14):305-320.
  • 9Ostriker J P,Kuh C V,Voytuk J A.A guide to the methodology of the National Research Council assessment ofdoctorate programs [ M ].National Academies Press,2009.
  • 10Herzberg,Frederick.The Motivation-Hygiene Concept and Problems of Manpower [ J ].Personnel Administrator,1964(27):3-7.

二级参考文献15

  • 1格威狄·博格,金伯利·宾汉·霍尔.高等教育中的质量与问责[M].毛亚庆,刘冷馨,译.北京:北京师范大学出版社,2008:50.
  • 2OSTRIKER J P, KUH C V. Assessing Research-Doctorate Program: A Methodology Study [M]. Washington D. C. : The National Academic Press, 2003.
  • 3HUGHES R. A Study of the Graduate Schools of America [M]. Oxford,Ohio: Miami University, 1925.
  • 4AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCACION. Report of Committee on Graduate Instruction[R]. Washington, DC: 1934.
  • 5KENISTON H. Graduate Study and Research in the Arts and Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania [M]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1959 : 5,119.
  • 6CARTTER M. An Assessment of Quality in Graduate Education [ M]. Washington, DC. : American Council on Education,1966.
  • 7ROOSE K D,ANDERSEN C J. A Rating of Graduate Programs[M]. American Council on Education,1970.
  • 8WEBSTER D S. America's Highest Ranked Graduate Schools, 1925 -- 1982[J]. Change, 1983, 15 (4):14 -24.
  • 9GOLDBERGER M L, MAHER B A,FLATTAU P E. Research-doctorate Programs in the United States: Continuity and change[M]. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1995 : 1,25-26,22.
  • 10TOUKOUSHIAN R K, DUNDAR H, BECKER W E. The National Research Council Graduate Program Ratings: What Are They Measuring [J]. The Review of Higher Education 1998,21 (4) : 427-443.

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部