摘要
作为社会文化建构的历史记忆,其重点或许不在于探寻哪种表征方式更接近真实的历史,而是质询历史记忆表征的政治学及其生产机制。小说《金山》和电影《金山》涉及对同一段华裔历史的再现,两种文本受制于不同的场域,呈现出迥异的记忆政治。处于跨文化场域中的海外华裔作家,个人习惯及其在文学场中的位置是影响文本表征的主要因素,历史记忆表现为一种寻根情愫与文化认同,而电影媒介处于资本与市场博弈的场域之中,历史记忆更像是一场视觉的消费盛宴。
It is more important to question the politics and mechanism of historical representation and discourse rather than explore how to approach the true history because historical memory is a cultural construction. The novel and movie Golden Mountain involve the representation of the same history, but they are subjected to different fields so as to exhibit diverse memorial politics. Being in the cross-cultural fields, oversea Chinese writers＇ creation will be affected by their personal habitus and places in the fields, so historical memory focuses on seeking the cultural root and identification. Film, being in the competition of capital and market, presents historical memory as a visual spectacle.
出处
《外国语文》
北大核心
2014年第1期36-39,共4页
Foreign Languages and Literature
关键词
历史记忆
影像记忆
重构
《金山》
场域
historical memory
visual memory
reconstruction
Golden Mountain
field
