期刊文献+

BP和壳牌发展战略比较分析

The Comparative Analysis of BP and Shell's Development Strategies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 回顾分析了英国石油公司(BP)和壳牌石油公司的发展历程。对其发展过程中业务由单一化走向上下游一体化的共同特征进行了解读。BP和壳牌不同的结构调整模式均有效地改变了公司的投资回报水平,BP的投资回报水平不及壳牌,主因是BP激进并购与剥离发展模式导致大量管理成本支出。从借鉴和学习的角度,提出对新兴石油公司调整发展模式、优化结构的建议。 The article reviews the development course of Briti sh Petroleum(BP) and Royal Dutch/Shell Group(Shell) and unscrambles the common characteristi cs of the business tendency from simplifi cation to upstream and downstream integration emerging in their development course. The different structural readjustment modes of BP and Shell both eff ecti vely changes their ROCE level, BP’s ROCE level is not as good as Shell’s, the main reason is that BP’s development mode of radical M&A and separation resulted in a great deal of management cost expenditure. From the angle of using their experience for reference and learning from them, the author puts forward suggestions for rising petroleum companies to readjust development mode and opti mize structure.
作者 罗佐县 梁慧
出处 《当代石油石化》 CAS 2013年第11期40-46,共7页 Petroleum & Petrochemical Today
关键词 BP 壳牌公司 一体化战略 差异化发展模式 原油自给率 结构调整 投资回报水平 BP Shell integrated strategy differentiation development mode degree of crude self-sufficiency structural readjustment ROCE
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Paul Stonham. BP Amoco: integrating competitive and financial strategy. Part one: strategic planning in the oil industry[J]. European Management Journal. August 2000,Volume 18, Issue 4 : 411-419.
  • 2罗卓辉,刘克雨.BP公司近十年快速稳健发展的几点经验[J].国际石油经济,2003,11(6):37-39. 被引量:2
  • 3BP、壳牌公司年报(2000-2011).
  • 4Shiko M. Ben-MenahemAuthor Vitae, Zenlin KweeAuthor Vitae, Henk W. VolberdaAuthor Vitae, Frans A.J. Van Den Bosch. Strategic Renewal Over Time: The Enabling Role of Potential Absorptive Capacity in Aligning Internal and External Rates of Change[J]. Long Range Planning. Volume 46, Issue 3, June 2013 : 216-235.
  • 5姜学峰.新世纪国际大石油公司发展战略新动向[J].国际石油经济,2004,12(9):13-19. 被引量:4
  • 6李凌.跨国并购失败的原因探析——基于制度理论视角[J].管理观察,2012(31):50-51. 被引量:1
  • 7Stefano Casertano. International oil companies in the post-studio era: Strategic responses of energy majors to the 2003-2008 price boom[J]. Energy Strategy Reviews. Volume 1, Issue 3, March 2013 : 211-217.

二级参考文献6

共引文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部