上市公司连锁董事对社会绩效的影响被引量：17

The Study on the Effect of Interlocking Directorate of Listed Company on Social Performance

导出

摘要连锁董事对企业经济绩效的影响已经获得很多学者的关注，但是，连锁董事对非经济绩效的影响却鲜有研究。本文基于制度理论视角，以中国A股上市公司181家数据样本为研究对象，通过2009～2012年连续四年的面板数据分析，对连锁董事作用于企业社会绩效的影响进行了实证研究。研究结果发现：（1）连锁董事在董事会中所占比例对社会绩效产生正向影响，这其中不包括董事长；（2）董事长形成的连锁关系对社会绩效产生负向影响；（3）企业的连锁网络中心度对社会绩效产生正向影响；（4）地区制度环境对连锁董事与社会绩效之间关系产生一定的调节作用。 Effects of interlocking directorate on economic performance of enterprise and a series of strategies have been the concern of many literatures, but the influence of interlocking directorate on non economic performance has been rarely studied so far. Corporate social responsibility has become an important factor affecting the survival and sustainable development of Chinese enterprises. Studying determinants of corporate social performance as well as their affecting process provides the premise to improve corporate social performance. Previous literatures paid low attention to the relationship between interlocking directorates and corporate social performance.

作者徐二明衣凤鹏

机构地区中国人民大学商学院

出处《经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期44-56,共13页 Business and Management Journal ( BMJ )

基金国家自然科学基金项目"中国企业创业中制度缺失与战略反应的研究"(71372157) 国家自然科学基金项目"中国转型经济背景下企业创业机会与资源开发行为研究"(71232011)

关键词连锁董事网络中心度企业社会绩效 interlocking directorate network centrality corporate social performance

分类号 F270 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献42

1Bansal P, Roth K. Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 2000, (43) :717 - 736.
2Carter C R, Jennings M M. Social Responsibility and Supply Chain Relationships [ J ]. Transportation Research, 2002, (38) : 37 - 52.
3Carter C R. Ethical Issues in International Buyer-supplier Relationships: A Dyadic Examination [ J ]. Journal of Operations Management ,2000, ( 18 ) : 191 - 208.
4Carter C R,Jennings M M. The Role of Purchasing in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Structural Equation Analysis [ J ]. Journal of Business Logistics,2004,25, ( 1 ) :145 - 186.
5Clemens E S, Cook J M. Politics and Institutionalism: Explaining Durability and Change [ J ]. Annual Review of Sociology, 1999, ( 25 ) :441 - 466.
6Boyd D E, Spekman R E, John W. Kamauff et al. Corporate Social Responsibility in Global Supply Chains : A Procedural Jus- tice Perspective [ J ]. Long Range Planning,2007 : 341 - 356.
7Driscoll J, Kraay A C. Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially Dependent Data [ J ]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1998, (80) : 549 - 560.
8DiMaggio P, Powell J W. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields [ J ]. American Sociological Review, 1983, (48) : 147 - 60.
9Greenwood C, Hinings C R. Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institu- tionalism[ J ]. Academy of Management Review, 1996,21, (4) :1022 - 1054.
10Haunschild P R. Interorganizational Imitation: The Impact of Interlocks on Corporate Acquistion Activity [ J ]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1993, (38) : 564 - 592.