期刊文献+

绩效评价公平感:结构、影响因素及管理启示 被引量:7

The Justice Perception of Performance Appraisal:Construct,Influencing Factors and its Highlights on Management Practice
原文传递
导出
摘要 绩效评价公平感一方面决定了员工对绩效评价过程及其结果的接受度;另一方面也直接影响到员工未来的工作态度和工作行为。从理论上来看,绩效评价公平感可划分为分配公平、程序公平以及互动公平等几种不同的类型。诸多实证研究表明,组织层面、评价者层面以及员工层面三个方面的因素都可能对员工绩效评价公平感产生影响,因此,要求组织在实践中必须全面理解绩效评价的目的,严格按照既定程序设计实施绩效评价体系,吸收员工全程参与,强化评价者的评价动机及评价能力。 Organizational equity is always regarded as a very important topic in the field of Human Resource Management. Especially, the justice perception of performance appraisal plays a core role in the implementation of performance appraisal system. Fairness or justice of performance appraisals has been identified as an important criterion in judging their effectiveness and usefulness for organizations. In addition to serving as criteria of effectiveness in performance appraisals,justice perception is also related to attitudes such as organizational commitment, trust in management and turnover intentions, and behaviors such as organizational citizenship behaviors. One of the reasons is that some important personnel decisions such as pay incentives and promotion are usually made basing on the results of employees' performance appraisal. So the employees really care about the fairness or justice of the performance appraisal. However, owing to the development of economic globalization in recent years, all of the organizations faced to a huge competition which led to unreasonable standards in the field of performance appraisal. Some managers found that the lower work satisfaction with employees, the lower employee commitment they have. In many cases, low justice perception of performance appraisal can bring about some counter-productive behaviors from employees. Therefore, both private and public organizations have to monitor and improve the employees' justice perception on performance appraisal.
出处 《经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期66-74,共9页 Business and Management Journal ( BMJ )
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"党政领导干部民主测评的优化与完善研究"(11BGL018)
关键词 绩效评价 公平感 程序公平 分配公平 互动公平 performance appraisal justice perception distributive justice procedural justice interactional justice
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Barr S H. , Brief A P. , Fulk J L. Correlates of Perceived Fairness and Accuracy of Performance [ J ]. Proceedings, 1981,8, ( 1 ) : 156 - 160.
  • 2Bies R J. Interactional in Justice:The Sacred and the Profane. Greenberg, Cropanzano R. Advances in Organizational Justice [ M ]. Stanford : Stanford University Press, 2001.
  • 3Bies R J. , Moag J S. Interactional Justice:Communication criteria for fairness [ A ]. Sheppard B. Research on Negotiation in Organizations [ C ]. Greenwich : JAIPress, 1986.
  • 4Boswell W R. , Boudreau J W. Employee Satisfaction with Performance Appraisals and Appraisers : the Role of Perceived Ap- praisal Use [ J ]. Human Resource Development Quarterly,2000,11, (3) :283 - 299.
  • 5Cardy R L. ,Dobbins G H. Performance Appraisal Alternative Perspective[M]. Cincinnati:South-Western Publishing,1994.
  • 6Colquitt J A. On the Dimensionality of Organizational Justice : A Construct Validation of a Measure [ J ]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001,86, ( 3 ) : 386 - 400.
  • 7Cooke R A. , Rousseau D M. Behavioral Norms and Expectations : A Quantitative Approach to the Assessment of Organizational Culture [ J ]. Group & organization management, 1988,13, (3) : 245 - 273.
  • 8Cropanzano R. , Ambrose M L. Procedural and Distributive Justice Are More Similar than You Think:A Monistic Perspective and a Research Agenda. Greenberg [ J ] . Cropanzano R. Advances in Organizational Justice [ C ]. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001.
  • 9Eisenberger R. , Huntington R. , Hutchison S. , et al. Perceived Organizational Support [ J ]. Journal of Applied Psychology,1986, (71) :500 -507.
  • 10Erdogan B. Antecedents and Consequences of Justice Perception in Performance Appraisals [ J ]. Human Resource Manage- ment Review, 2002,12, (4) : 555 - 559.

二级参考文献55

  • 1陈学军,王重鸣.内隐绩效模型对绩效评估一致性的效应分析[J].心理科学,2003,26(2):212-214. 被引量:8
  • 2周浩,龙立荣.绩效考核中宽大效应的成因及控制方法[J].心理科学进展,2005,13(6):806-813. 被引量:14
  • 3Boswell W. R., Boudreau J. W.. Seperating the Developmental and Evaluative Performance Appraisal Uses. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2002, 16(3): 391-412.
  • 4McNerney D. J.. Improved Performance Appraisals: Process of Elimination. HRFocus, 1995, (7): 5.
  • 5Murphy K. R., Cleveland J. N.. Understanding Performance Appraisal: Social, Organizational and Goal-based Perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA, 1995: Sage Publications.
  • 6Levy P. E., Williams J. R.. The Social Context of Performance Appraisal: Review and Framework for the Future. Journal of management, 2004, 30(6): 881-905.
  • 7Cleveland J. N., Murphy K. R., Williams R. E.. Multiple Uses of Performance Appraisal: Prevalence and Correlates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989, 74(1): 130-135.
  • 8Meyer H. H., Kay E., French J. R. P., Jr. Split Roles in Performance Appraisal. Harvard Business Review, 1965, (43): 123-129.
  • 9Mckenna E., Beech N.. Human Resource Management. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997:116—127.
  • 10George J. M., Jones G. R.. Understanding and Managing Organizational Behavior (Second Edition). Addison-wisley Publishing Company, 1999.

共引文献121

同被引文献109

引证文献7

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部