期刊文献+

基于证据理论的群组层次分析法判断矩阵集结方法 被引量:2

An Aggregation Method for Group AHP Judgment Matrices Based on the Evidence Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对现有群组集结方法关注于专家权重和集结元素之间相似性,缺少对层次分析法(AHP)判断矩阵元素一致性考虑的不足,提出一种基于证据理论的群组AHP判断矩阵集结方法。该方法以群组AHP判断矩阵元素的相似性和一致性为证据源,采用DS证据理论计算上三角元素的合理性指标值;并以该指标值为边权计算最大生成树和相对应的完全一致矩阵;该方法在完全一致矩阵和PG算子集结矩阵的约束下,结合残缺元素的修复策略,计算满足最优相似一致度的群组集结结果。通过算例分析,说明该方法的可行性与有效性。 The existing group aggregation methods pay more attentions on the weights of experts and the similarity between entries being fused,but has not synthetically considered the satisfactory consistency of entries located in the same matrix. Therefore,an aggregation method for the group matrices is proposed. With the evidential sources associated with the similarity and consistency for the entries in group matrices,the method uses DS evidence theory to calculate the rationality of upper triangle entries,which can be used to calculate the maximum spanning tree and the corresponding consistent matrix. Under the constraints of the consistent matrix and the collective matrix obtained by the PG operator,the method can calculate the optimum similarity-consistency result with the estimation of missed entries in an incomplete matrix. Finally,the numerical examples show that the method is feasible and effective.
出处 《科学技术与工程》 北大核心 2014年第15期1-4,16,共5页 Science Technology and Engineering
关键词 层次分析法 证据理论 最大生成树 判断矩阵 群组集结 analytical hierarchy process(AHP) evidence theory maximum spanning tree judgment matrix group aggregation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Dong Y C, Hong W C, Xu Y F, et al. Numerical scales generated individually for analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Oper- ational Research, 2013; 229:654-662.
  • 2Saaty T L. Principles of the analytical hierarchy process. London: Springer-Verlag, 1987 Saaty T L. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. In- ternational Journal. of Services Sciences, 2008 ;1 ( 1 ) : 83-98.
  • 3徐泽水.基于残缺互补判断矩阵的交互式群决策方法[J].控制与决策,2005,20(8):913-916. 被引量:28
  • 4董玉成,陈义华.综合判断矩阵的几个性质[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(2):62-66. 被引量:7
  • 5Zarghami M, Szidarovszky F, Ardakanian R. A fuzzy-stochastic OWA model for robust multi-criteria decision making. Fuzzy Optimization Decision Making, 2008; 7( 1 ): 1-15.
  • 6Xu Z S, ager R R. Power-geometric operators and their use in group decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2010; 18 ( 1 ) : 94-105.
  • 7Nordstrom L. Assessment of information security levels in power com- munication systems using evidential reasoning. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2008 ; 23 (3) : 1384-1391.
  • 8Nordstrom L. Assessment of information security levels in power com- munication systems using evidential reasoning. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2008 ; 23 (3) : 1354-1391.
  • 9Dong Y C, Xu Y F, Yu S. Linguistic multiperson decision making based on the use of multiple preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Sys- tems, 2009; 160:603-623.
  • 10Herrera-Viedma E, Chiclana F, Hcrrera F, et al. Group decision- making model with incomplete fuzzypreference relations based on ad- ditive consistency. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cyber- netics-Part B : Cybernetics, 2007 ; 37 ( 1 ) : 176-189.

二级参考文献16

  • 1董玉成,陈义华.层次分析法(AHP)中的检验[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(7):105-110. 被引量:40
  • 2徐泽水.残缺互补判断矩阵[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(6):93-97. 被引量:29
  • 3董玉成,陈义华,王双.基于相容性修正的群组决策排序算法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(10):86-91. 被引量:11
  • 4刘心报.判断矩阵一致性的凸性[J].系统工程理论与实践,1997,17(4):87-89. 被引量:13
  • 5Saaty T L. A ratio scale metric and the compatibility of ratio scales: On the possibility of arrow's impossibility theorem[A]. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process[C]. Washington,DC,33-40.
  • 6Saaty T L.The Analytic Hierarchy Process [M].McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.
  • 7Aguaron J,Moreno-Jimenez J M.The geometric consistency index: Approximated thresholds [J].European Journal of Operational Research ,2003,147 (1), 137-145.
  • 8Xu Z.On consistency of the weighted geometric mean complex judgement matrix in AHP [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2000,126 : 683-687.
  • 9Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera V E. Integrating Three Representation Models in Fuzzy Multipurpose Decision Making Based on Fuzzy Preference Relations[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1998,97(1):33-48.
  • 10Baets B, Fodor J. Principles of Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Decision Making[M]. Ghent: Academic Press,2003.

共引文献32

同被引文献28

引证文献2

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部