期刊文献+

复方福尔可定口服溶液治疗儿童呼吸道感染的临床效果分析 被引量:7

Clinical efficacy analysis of compound pholcodine oral solution in treatment of children with respiratory tract infection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨复方福尔可定口服溶液治疗儿童呼吸道感染的临床效果.方法 选取本院2012年1月~2014年1月收治的80例呼吸道感染患儿,将其随机分为观察组和对照组,观察组给予复方福尔可定口服溶液治疗,对照组给予克咳小儿止咳糖浆治疗,比较两组的疗效.结果 观察组治疗后咳嗽、咳痰症状积分分别为(0.32±0.11)分、(0.28±0.02)分,明显低于对照组的(0.94±0.03)分、(0.79±0.10)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).观察组总有效率为92.5%,明显高于对照组的72.5%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).两组患儿治疗期间均未见明显不良反应.结论 复方福尔可定口服溶液治疗儿童呼吸道感染效果显著,可明显改善患儿的临床症状,提高治愈率. Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of compound pholcodine oral solution in the treatment of children with respiratory tract infection.Methods 80 cases of children with respiratory infections treated in our hospital from January 2012 to January 2014 were selected and were randomly divided into olaservation group and control group,the compound pholcodine oral solution treatment was given to the observation group,the control group was given with grams cough treatment o,f pediatric cough syrup,the clinical efficacy of the two groups was observed.Results After treatment, the cough,sputum symptom seore of observation group was 0.32±0.11 and 0.28±0.02,significantly less than that of the control group (0.94±0.03 and 0,79±0.10),the difference was significant (P〈0.05).The total effective rate of observation group was 92.5%,significantly higher than 72.5% of the control group,the difference was significant (P〈0.05).The two groups showed no significant-adverse reactions during treatment.Conclusion The effect of compound pholcodine oral solution for children with respiratory tract infection is significant,can significantly improve the clinical symptoms,improve the cure rate.
作者 陈敏 罗斯
出处 《中国当代医药》 2014年第14期95-97,共3页 China Modern Medicine
关键词 复方福尔可定口服溶液 儿童呼吸道感染 临床疗效 Compound pholcodine oral solution Children with respiratory tract infection Clinical efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献19

  • 1陆权,俞惠民,秦铭,王莹,陆敏,陈志明,季纯珍,肖洁.小儿止咳露(澳特斯)临床疗效随机对照分析[J].临床儿科杂志,2005,23(12):865-867. 被引量:15
  • 2彭汶铎 许实波.四种远志皂苷的镇咳和祛痰作用[J].中国药学杂志,1998,38(8):491-491.
  • 3陈灏珠.实用内科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009.
  • 4Findlay JWA, FowleASE, ButzRF, et al. Comparative disposition of codeine and pholcodine in man after single oral doses. Br J Clinpharmac, 1986,22:61-67.
  • 5胡亚美 江载芳.诸福棠实用儿科学[M] 7版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2002.698-705.
  • 6胡亚美,江载芳.诸福棠实用儿科学[M].7版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2003:821-825.
  • 7Jaffe G, Grimshaw JJ. Randomised single-blind trial in general practice comparing the efficacy and palatability of two cough linctus preparations, pholcolix' and actifed' compound in children with acute cough[ J]. Curr Med Res Opin, 1983,8 : 594 - 599.
  • 8何世晔.复方福尔可定口服溶液疗效观察[J].中外健康文摘,2011,8(17):234-235.
  • 9Findlay JW. Pholcodine[J]. J Clin Pharm Ther, 1988,13 (1) :5-17.
  • 10刘蓉,何晓芸,余静,等.复方福尔可定口服溶液化痰止咳作用的疗效观察[J].2007,22(7):538-539.

共引文献20

同被引文献50

引证文献7

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部