期刊文献+

论卢曼法律悖论理论的隐秘源头 被引量:4

On the Classical Source of Luhmann's Theory of Paradox
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从康德到卢曼近两百年的德国思想史,贯穿了对于悖论问题的思考这一条红线。经过费希特对"自我与非我"的论述以及黑格尔对费希特思想的扬弃,德国古典哲学家们在悖论问题上呈现出了连贯的思考脉络。二十世纪后期,德国古典哲学中的"主体"虽然已经转换为卢曼社会理论中的"系统",但是德国先贤们的智力资源却潜入到了卢曼的社会理论中,并成为其法律悖论思想的一个隐秘源头。文章通过在费希特、黑格尔关于悖论的思想与卢曼法律社会学中的悖论理论之间的对比研究,展示了卢曼在其法律悖论思想中对于德国古典哲学传统的反思性继承和创造性超越。 In the history of German philosophy from Kant to Luhmann,the thinking around the problem of paradox is definitely a strand going through almost two hundred years.Fichte’s discussion on “self and non-self”and Hegel’s relevant theory demonstrate that there was some consistent and successive research on the problem of paradox in German classical thought.In the latter half of the twentieth century,though the key word “subject”in German classical philosophy were replaced by“system”in Luhmann’s social theory,the resources provided by German antecessors became the necessary premise of the theory of legal paradox contributed by Luhmann,who inherited but at same time went beyond classical thoughts.
作者 宾凯
出处 《同济大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期91-98,共8页 Journal of Tongji University:Social Science Edition
基金 上海交通大学文理交叉项目"基于人工智能的司法推理"(项目编号:11JCY12)资助
关键词 法律悖论 卢曼 黑格尔 费希特 Legal paradox Ficht Hegel Luhmann
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1[德]哈贝马斯.现代性的哲学话语[M].曹卫东,等译.北京:译林出版社,2004.
  • 2Luhmann, Nik|as. Law as a Social System [M]. Trans. Klaus A. Ziegert. Ed. Fatima Kastner. Oxford, NewYork: Oxford University Press, 2004.
  • 3[德]黑格尔.哲学史讲演录(第四卷)[M].贺麟,王太庆译.北京:商务印书馆,1981:347-383.
  • 4谢地坤.西方哲学名著提要[M].南昌:江西人民出版社,2002.
  • 5[德]费希特.全部知识学的基础[M].王玖兴译.北京:商务印书馆,1997.
  • 6Luhmann, Niklas, Essays on Self-reference [M]. New York: Columbia University Press, c1990.
  • 7[英]哈特.法律的概念[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1999..
  • 8Teubner, Gunther. Alienating Justice: On the Social Surplus Value of the Twelfth Camel[M]//Jiri Priban and David Nelken. Lawns New boundaries. The Consequences of Legal Autopoiesis. Dartmouth: Ashgate, 2001.
  • 9Teubner, Gunther. Dealing with Paradoxes of Law: Derrida, Luhmann, Wieth01ter[M]//Gunther Teubner and Oren Perez. Paradoxes and Inconsistencies in the Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005.
  • 10Derrida, Jacques. Force of Law: The Mystical Foundation of Authority[M]//Ed. D. Cornell, M. Rosenfeld and N. Benjamin. Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice. London: Routledge, 1992.

共引文献10

同被引文献47

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部