摘要
目的 探讨思密达治疗老年患者Ⅱ期压疮的效果。方法 将2011年2月-2012年9月本院收治的52例老年皮肤压疮患者随机分为实验组(压疮破溃处涂思密达)和对照组(压疮破溃处涂溃疡粉),每组各26例。比较两种药物治疗的效果。结果 实验组患者治疗效果明显优于对照组,且皮肤愈合时间明显短于对照组,两组比较,均P〈0.05,差异具有统计学意义。结论 思密达治疗老年患者Ⅱ期压疮效果明显优于溃疡粉,而且其操作方法简便,价格低廉,值得临床推广应用。
Objective To investigate the effect of Smecta on Ⅱ pressure ulcers in elderly patients. Methods Fifty-two elderly patients with skin pressure ulcers hospitalized in our hospital during February 2011 and September 2012 were randomly divided into experimental group (n=26), in which Smecta was applied on the pressure ulcers, and control group (n=26), in which ulcers powders were applied on the ulcers. The two groups were compared concerning the curative effects. Results The curative effect in the experimental group was significantly better than that of the control group (P 〈 0.05) and the time for ulcers healing in the former group was significantly shorter than that of the control (P 〈 0.05). Conclusions Smecta is more effective in the treatment of pressure ulcers in elderly patients with Ⅱ pressure nlcers. It is simple in clinical use and cheap in cost, which should be encouraged for wider use.
出处
《现代临床护理》
2014年第3期44-46,共3页
Modern Clinical Nursing
关键词
思密达
老年患者
Ⅱ期压疮
Smeeta
elderly patients
stage Ⅱ pressnre ulcers