期刊文献+

体征对灰眉岩鹀鸣唱频率特征的影响 被引量:5

Lack of Body Size and Beak Length Constraints on the Frequency of Emberiza godlewskii's Song
原文传递
导出
摘要 声信号是鸟类交流的重要方式。鸟类的鸣声特征受到生境的塑造和性选择,也受到发声器官的影响,如种间的比较研究发现,体重大的鸟类鸣声频率低,喙短的鸟类鸣声频宽大。在种内是否也存在类似的规律,目前的结论还不一致。2012年6月,在北京小龙门地区(40°00'N,115°26'E)测量了17只灰眉岩鹀(Emberiza godlewskii)的形态参数以及鸣声的频率特征,未发现体重或喙长与鸣声的最高频率、最低频率、峰频或频宽存在显著的相关性。本研究的结果支持在小型雀形目鸟类中,体型对繁殖期鸣唱频率特征的影响不显著。 Acoustic signal is important for bird communication. Differences in vocal characteristics are usually explained by habitat-dependent selection on signal transmission and/or sexual selection by female preference. The organ to produce signals can also be influence on signal features, for example, the negative relationship between frequency and body size, between frequency bandwidth and beak length. These negative relationships usually stand between species, but it is unclear whether such relationships exist within species. In this study we trapped 17 individuals of Emberiza godlewskii by mist nets using acoustic playback of the species'song in Beijing Xiaolongmen forest Park (40°00′N,115°26′E) in breeding season from June 2^nd to 12^th in 2012. We recorded the sound from 122 to 542 s for each individuals with mean 300 s in WAV format (44. 1 kHz, 16 bit) using a Tascam HD-P2 portable digital recorder (Tascam Co. Japan ) and a Sennheiser MKH416 P48 external directional microphone (Sennheiser Electronic Co., Germany ). We measured the maximum frequency, minimum frequency, peak frequency, and frequency range from the sound ( Fig. 1 ). In the meantime we took their morphological characteristics, including weight, wing length, tail length, total length, and beak length. We used a principal component analysis to compress the original morphological characteristics into comprehensive body size measurement (Table 1 ) , described the frequency traits of sounds and morphological characteristics (Table 2), and tested their relationship using Pearson correlation analysis. We didn't find any significant correlation between the sound frequency traits and body size/beak length (Table 3 ). Our resultssupport that the relationship between sound frequency and body size/beak length may not significant in small size Passeriformes birds.
出处 《动物学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第3期334-340,共7页 Chinese Journal of Zoology
基金 国家自然科学基金基础科学人才培养基金能力提高项目(No.J1210075)
关键词 灰眉岩鹀 鸣声特征 身体量度 Emberiza godlewskii Sound characteristic Morphological measurement
  • 相关文献

参考文献36

  • 1Badyaev A V, Leaf E S. 1997. Habitat associations of song characteristics in Phylloscopus and Hippolais warblers. Auk, 114(1): 40-46.
  • 2Beecher M D. 1996. Birdsong learning in the laboratory and field // Kroodsma D E, Miller E H. Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds. New York: Cornell University Press, 61-78.
  • 3Bertelli S, Tubaro P L. 2002. Body mass and habitat correlates of song structure in a primitive group of birds. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 77(4) : 423 -430.
  • 4Byers B E. Kroodsma D E. 2009. Female mate choice and songbird song repertoires. Animal Behaviour, 77 ( 1 ) : 13 - 22.
  • 5Cardoso G C. 2012. Paradoxical calls: the opposite signaling role of sound frequency across bird species. Behavioral Ecology, 23(2): 237-241.
  • 6Cardoso G C, Hu Y, Mota P G. 2012. Birdsong, sexual selection, and the flawed taxonomy of canaries, goldfinches and allies. Animal Behaviour, 84(1): 111-119.
  • 7Cardoso G C, Mamede A T, Atwell J W, et al. 2008. Song frequency does not reflect differences in body size among males in two oscine species. Ethology, 114(11): 1084-1093.
  • 8Catchpole C K, Slater P J B. 2008. Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 20-28, 85-112, 71 -202.
  • 9Derryberry E P. 2009. Ecology shapes birdsong evolution: variation in morphology and habitat explains variation in white-crowned sparrow song. American Naturalist, 174 ( 1 ) : 24 - 33.
  • 10Derryberry E P, Seddon N, Claramunt S, et al. 2012. Correlated evolution of beak morphology and song in the Neotropical woodcreeper radiation. Evolution, 66 (9) : 2784 - 2797.

二级参考文献51

  • 1周艳,苏慧,郭晓燕,王宁,周云龙.北京小龙门自然保护区四种苔藓鸟巢的观察[J].动物学杂志,2005,40(5):110-113. 被引量:11
  • 2王宁,张雁云,郑光美.黄眉姬鹟和白眉姬鹟繁殖期的栖息地与活动区特征[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2006,42(3):295-299. 被引量:10
  • 3蔡熙煦,田明月,罗辑,王宁,周云龙.宝兴歌鸫和北红尾鸲巢中藓类植物的研究[J].四川动物,2007,26(1):137-140. 被引量:7
  • 4蔡其侃.北京鸟类志[M].北京:北京出版社,1987.97-98.
  • 5Balsby TJS, Hansen P. 2010. Element repertoire: Change and development with age in whitethroat Sylvia communis song. Journal of Ornithology, 151 : 469-476.
  • 6Beecher MD, Brenowitz EA. 2005. Functional aspects of song learning in songbirds. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20: 143-149.
  • 7Briefer E, Aubin T, Lehongre K, et al. 2008. How to identify dear enemies: The group signature in the complex song of the skylark Alauda arvensis. Journal of Experimental Biology, 211: 317-326.
  • 8Briefer E, Osiejuk TS, Rybak F, et al. 2010. Are bird song complexity and song sharing shaped by habitat structure? An information theory and statistical approach. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 262 : 151 - 164.
  • 9Catchpole CK, Slater PJB. 2008. Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations ( Second Edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 10Dale J, Lank DB, Reeve HK. 2001. Signaling individual identity versus quality: A model and case studies with ruffs,queleas, and house finches. American Naturalist, 158:75 -86.

共引文献4

同被引文献14

引证文献5

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部