期刊文献+

中国区域位势高度场探空与再分析资料的对比分析 被引量:13

Comparison of geopotential height between reanalysis and radiosonde data over China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用中国高空探空资料和NCEP/NCAR、ERA以及JRA 3种再分析资料,采用偏差、线性趋势、EOF等统计方法,分析、讨论了再分析资料位势高度场在中国区域的适用性问题。结果表明:在年平均场上,探空资料在中国北方地区对流层中存在上升趋势,在平流层低层存在下降趋势;并且有整层变化相同的年际变化特征和对流层南北方反位相变化的年代际变化特征。再分析资料位势高度场数值上普遍小于探空资料;NCEP/NCAR资料与探空资料较为接近。在季节平均场上,探空资料在冬季对流层中存在一致的上升趋势,在春、夏和秋季的长期变化趋势与年平均场类似;探空资料与再分析资料在冬季的偏差最小。不同资料的EOF第一模态分布,在不同季节中差别较大,NCEP/NCAR资料在春季、夏季和冬季适用性较高,ERA资料在秋季适用性较高。 Based on the radiosonde and reanalysis data from NCEP/NCAR, ERA and JRA, by using deviation, linear trend, EOF statistics methods, the applicability evaluation of the atmospheric geo- potential heights in China is conducted in this paper. Results indicate that the annual mean geopotential heights are going up in the troposphere while a drop exists in the tropopause and lower stratosphere over the northern China. An in-phase variation in geopotential heights over the whole troposphere on interannu- al time scale and an anti-phase one over the north and south China on deeadal time-scale are obvious. Generally, the geopotential height values of the three reanalysis datasets are lower than that of observa- tion, among them, the NCEP geopotential height is the closest to the observation. In terms of seasonal mean field, geopotential heights show an upward trend in the troposphere in winter, while in other sea- sons, the trend is consistent with that of annual mean field. In addition, the smallest deviation between radiosonde and reanalysis datasets appears in winter. Overall, NCEP geopotential heights agree well with the observed ones in spring, summer and winter, while ERA performs much better in autumn.
出处 《气象科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第2期128-138,共11页 Journal of the Meteorological Sciences
基金 公益性行业(气象)科研专项(GYHY200906014-02) 国家自然科学基金项目(41275094) 江苏省“青蓝工程”资助项目 江苏省高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)
关键词 探空资料 再分析资料 年际变化 季节变化 Radiosonde dataset Reanalysis dataset Interannual variation Seasonal variation
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Marshall G J. Trends in the Southern Annularglode from observa- tions and reanalyses. J. Climate, 2003, 16 ( 24 ) : 4134-4143.
  • 2Grot R. Different data, different general circulations? A compari- son of selected fields in NCEP/DOE AMIP-Ⅱ and ECWMF ERA- 40 reanalysis. Dynam. Atmos. Oceans, 2008, 44(3-4) : 108-142.
  • 3MA Lijuan, ZHANG Tingjun, LI Qingxiang, et al. Evaluation of ERA-40, NCEP-1, and NCEP-2 reanalysis air temperatures with ground-based measurements in China. J. Geophys. Res., 2008, 111 (D15) : doi : 10.1029/2007JD009549.
  • 4Higgings R W, Kousky V E, Silua V B S, et al. Intercomparison of daily precipitation statistics over the United States in observa- tions and in NCEP reanalysis products. J. Climate, 2010, 23 (17) : 4637-4650.
  • 5徐影,丁一汇,赵宗慈.美国NCEP/NCAR近50年全球再分析资料在我国气候变化研究中可信度的初步分析[J].应用气象学报,2001,12(3):337-347. 被引量:162
  • 6赵天保,符淙斌.中国区域ERA-40、NCEP-2再分析资料与观测资料的初步比较与分析[J].气候与环境研究,2006,11(1):14-32. 被引量:126
  • 7赵天保,符淙斌,柯宗建,郭维栋.全球大气再分析资料的研究现状与进展[J].地球科学进展,2010,25(3):242-254. 被引量:121
  • 8Kalnay E, Kanamitsu M, Kistler R, et al. The NCEP/NCAR 40- year reanalysis project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 1996, 77(3) : 437-471.
  • 9Kistler R, Kalnay E, Collins W, et al. The NCEP-NCAR 50-year reanalysis: Monthly means CD-ROM and documentation. Bull. A- mer. Meteor. Soc., 2001, 82(2): 247-267.
  • 10Onogi K, Tsutsui J, Koide H, et al. The JRA-25 reanalysis. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 2007, 85(3): 369-432.

二级参考文献167

共引文献494

同被引文献235

引证文献13

二级引证文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部