期刊文献+

超声不同乳腺分型腺体组织硬度分析 被引量:6

Stiffness of mammary gland in different ultrasonograpic classifications
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同乳腺超声分型的腺体组织硬度。方法超声检查336例女性单侧乳腺,根据腺体组织厚度与结构将乳腺分为腺体型、腺纤维型和脂肪型,比较不同乳腺类型腺体组织的应变彩色直方图均值。结果腺体型128例,腺纤维型132例,脂肪型76例;脂肪型乳腺腺体组织的应变彩色直方图均值(38.37±16.35)小于腺体型(47.88±15.56)和腺纤维型(44.28±14.98)(P<0.01),腺体型与腺纤维型比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论脂肪型乳腺腺体组织硬度较腺体型和腺纤维型乳腺腺体组织硬度大,腺体型和腺纤维型乳腺的腺体组织硬度无明显差异。 Objective To analyze the stiffness of mammary gland in different ultrasonographic classifications. Methods A total of 336 patients were examined unilateral mammary gland. According to the thickness and structure of the mammary gland tissue on ultrasound images, the mammary gland tissue was categorized into glandular, fibroglandular and fatty types. The mean value of histogram was compared in different gland types. Results In 336 patients, glandular type was found in 128, fibroglandular type in 132 and fatty type in 76. The mean value of histogram was lower in fatty type (38.37±16.35) than that in glandular (47.88±15.56) and fibroglandular (44.28±14.98) types (P〈0.01), and was not different between glandular type and fibroglandular type (P〉0.05). Conclusions The mammary gland tissue is harder in fatty type than that in glandular and fobroglandular types, and shows no significant difference between glandular type and fibroglandular type.
出处 《中华实用诊断与治疗杂志》 2014年第6期585-586,589,共3页 Journal of Chinese Practical Diagnosis and Therapy
关键词 超声分型 应变彩色直方图平均值 腺体组织硬度 Ultrasonographic classification mean value of histogram the stiffness of the breast tissue
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献31

  • 1徐智章,俞清.超声弹性成像原理及初步应用[J].上海医学影像,2005,14(1):3-5. 被引量:167
  • 2冯霞,罗葆明,欧冰,杨海云,文艳玲,智慧.超声弹性成像评分标准对乳腺良恶性病变诊断价值的探讨[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2007,18(1):44-45. 被引量:31
  • 3罗葆明,欧冰,智慧,曾婕,杨海云.改良超声弹性成像评分标准在乳腺肿块鉴别诊断中的价值[J].现代临床医学生物工程学杂志,2006,12(5):396-398. 被引量:368
  • 4Birkenfeld A, Kase NG. Functional anatomy and physiology of the female breast. Obstet Gyneeol Clin North Am,1994,21:433-444.
  • 5侯新燕,朱洁,安妮,矫健,焦冰,简文豪.正常成年女性静止期乳腺实质的超声分型[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2007,16(8):696-698. 被引量:17
  • 6Lee H J, Kim E K, Kim M J, et al. Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound[J]. Eur J Radiol,2008,65(2) :293-298.
  • 7Ophir J, C4spedes I, Ponnekanti H, et al. Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues[J]. Ultrason Imaging,1991,13(2) :111-134.
  • 8Ophir J,Cespedes I,Ponnekanti H. Elastography:a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues[J].{H}Ultrasonic Imaging,1991,(2):111-134.
  • 9Khalil A S,Chan R C,Chau A H. Tissue elasticity estimation with optical coherence elastography:toward mechanical characterization of in vivo soft tissue[J].{H}Annals of Biomedical Engineering,2005,(11):1631-1639.
  • 10Shigeno K,Igawa M,Shiina H. Transrectal colour Doppler ultrasonography for quantifying angiogenesis in prostate cancer[J].{H}BJU International,2003,(3):223-226.

共引文献116

同被引文献53

引证文献6

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部