期刊文献+

缔约能力制度比较研究 被引量:11

A Comparative Study on the Contract Concluding Capacity System
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文对罗马法系、英美法系、德国法系一些国家的缔约能力制度进行了比较分析 ,并就此提出了在立法中完善我国的缔约能力制度的具体建议。 All legal systems have rules which deny contractual capacity to minors, lunatics, and incompetents under certain conditions. The function of these rules is basically protective. This article analysis the contractual capacity rules of three legal family, and give some opinions for the perfect of the contractual capacity rule in China.
作者 李先波
出处 《中国法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2001年第1期102-108,共7页 China Legal Science
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1See Roberts v. Gray, [1913] I KB520.
  • 2Doyle v. Wbite City Stadium, Ltd., [1935] 1 KB 110.
  • 3See also Chaplin v.Leslie Frewln (Publishers) Ltd., [1966] Ch. 71.
  • 4See Valentini v. Canali, (1889) 24 QBD 166.
  • 5Pearce v. Brain, [1929] 2 KB 310.
  • 6compare TREITEL, 73 LQRev.202 ff (1957).
  • 7compare ATIYAH,74 LQRev. 101 ft. (1958).
  • 8See K. Zweigert and H. Kotz ( translated by Tony Weir), An Iatroductictl to Comparative Law Vohane Ⅱ --The Institution of Private Law Second Edition, Clarendon Press Orford, 1987,p. 32.
  • 9See K. Zweigert and H. Kotz ( translated by Tony Weir), An Iatroductictl to Comparative Law Vohane Ⅱ --The Institution of Private Law Second Edition, Clarendon Press Orford, 1987,p. 33.
  • 10See K. Zweigert and H. Kotz ( translated by Tony Weir), An Iatroductictl to Comparative Law Vohane Ⅱ --The Institution of Private Law Second Edition, Clarendon Press Orford, 1987,p. 29.

同被引文献132

引证文献11

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部