期刊文献+

报应不应成为刑罚的目的 被引量:2

On the Location of Retribution in the Theory of Penalty Purpose
下载PDF
导出
摘要 报应是基于行为人所实施的犯罪行为而应对其无条件强制施加的、与其所犯之罪相应的惩罚。从中外刑罚史上看,都不存在以报应为目的的刑罚。同时,报应无法合理地回答现实社会中刑罚的发动及其幅度问题,因此,报应不应成为刑罚的目的。 Retribution in the theory of penalty purpose means a punishment which is based on the criminal offence and conflicted on the criminal with on other reasons that is accordance with criminal offence. The history of penalty reveals that retribution almost has no space to survive. The retribution in penalty ignored social reality and its development, and can not answer the launching of penalty and its extent questions in social realities. Retribution has no way to be the purpose of penalty.
作者 邱帅萍
出处 《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第3期88-91,共4页 Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
基金 湖南省社科基金项目"刑罚结构调整问题研究"(12YBB092)
关键词 刑罚目的 报应 预防 the purpose of penaty retribution precaution
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1蔡一军.西方刑罚目的观的整合与修正[J].社会科学家,2013,28(9):86-89. 被引量:1
  • 2汉穆拉比法典[M].《世界著名法典汉译丛书》编委会译.北京:法律出版社,2004.
  • 3[美]威廉·伊恩·米勒.以眼还眼[M].郑文龙,廖溢爱译.杭州:浙江人民出版社,2009.
  • 4龙腾云.重提刑罚进化论的缘由及其研究现状述评[A].赵秉志.刑法评论[C].北京:法律出版社,2012.
  • 5[日]仁井田隍.中国法制史[M].牟发松译.上海古籍出版社,2011.
  • 6[英]凯伦·法林顿.刑罚的历史[M].太原:希望出版社,2003
  • 7[德]康德.法的形而上学原理-权利的科学[M].沈叔平,译.北京:商务印书馆,1991.
  • 8Jean - Christophe Merle. German Idealism and The Concept of Pun- ishment[ M]. Cambridge University press,2009.
  • 9[美]保罗·H·罗宾逊.刑法的分配原则--准应受罚?如何量刑?[M].沙丽金译.北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2009.

二级参考文献13

  • 1PAUL RICHARD SCHUPP. Legitimation crisis and penal severity: constructing a radical theoretical explanation of le- gitimation crisis and mass incarceration in the post world war Ⅱ United States[M]. Now York: UMI company,2005.1-9.
  • 2HERBERT MORRIS. Persons and punishment [J]. The Monist,1968,(52): 475-501.
  • 3ANDREW VON HIRSCH. Proportionality in the philosophy of punishment: from "why punish?" to "how much?" [J]. Criminal Law Forum, 1990,(1): 259-290.
  • 4MURPHY J G, HAMPTON J. Forgiveness and mercy[M]. Cambridge: Cambr dge Un vers ty Press, 1988. 1-3.
  • 5JOEL FEINBERG. Doing and deserving [M]. Princeton: Princeton Universitv Press.1970.98.
  • 6GOWERS E. Rethinking democracy [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1953. 53.
  • 7EMILE DURKHEIM. The division of labor in society[M].Paris: Free Press,1960.2.
  • 8ANDREW VON HIRSCH, ANDREW ASHWORTH. Propor- tionate sentencing: exploring the principles[M]. Oxford:Ox- ford University Press,2005.142.
  • 9ANDREW VON HIRSCH. Past or future crimes: deserved- ness and dangerousness in the sentencing of criminals[M]. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1985.38-46.
  • 10JOEL FEINBERG. Noncomparative justice [J]. The Philo- sophical Review, 1974,(3): 297- 298.

共引文献60

同被引文献32

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部