期刊文献+

招飞体检主视眼与非主视眼隐斜检查对比观察

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:观察比较招飞体检主视眼与非主视眼前放置便携式隐斜计,对隐斜检查结果的影响。方法:选择海军招飞体检上站学员350例,利用卡孔法判定被检学员主视眼。主视眼(主视眼组)与非主视眼(非主视眼组)前分别放置便携式隐斜计测量隐斜值;另外采用Von Graefe法(对照组)测量隐斜值。比较3组内隐斜、外隐斜和上隐斜。结果:3组间内隐斜和外隐斜比较,差异显著(P<0.05);主视眼组与对照组比较,差异显著(P<0.05);非主视眼组与对照组比较,差异不显著(P>0.05);主视眼组与非主视眼组比较,差异显著(P<0.05)。3组间上隐斜比较,差异不显著(P>0.05)。结论:招飞体检主视眼前放置便携式隐斜计,对水平性隐斜(内隐斜和外隐斜)影响显著,对垂直性隐斜(上隐斜)影响不显著;非主视眼前放置便携式隐斜计检查结果更准确。
出处 《人民军医》 2014年第6期614-615,共2页 People's Military Surgeon
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Escalante JB, Rosenfield M. Effect of heterophoria measurement tech- nique on the clinical accommodative convergence to accommodation ratio[J]. Optometry, 2006,77 (5) : 229-334.
  • 2Casillas CE,Rosenfield M. Comparison of subjective heterophoria tes- ting with a phoropter and trial frame[J]. Optom Vis Sci, 2006,83 (4) :237-241.
  • 3Kim EH, Granger DB, Vicci VR, et al. The relationship between pho- ria and the ratio of convergence peak velocity to divergence peak ve- locity[J]. Invest Ophthalmo/Vis Sci,2010,51(8) :4017-4027.
  • 4Calvin H,Rupnow P,Grosvenor To How good is the estimated cover test at predicting the von Graefe phoria measurement[J]. Optom Vis Sci,1996,73(11) :701-706.
  • 5Altiparmak UE, Karabulut E, Eggenberger ER. A novel hand-held device for the measurement of ocular alignment [J]. Turk J Med Sci, 2010,40(4) :511.
  • 6Toole AJ, Fogt N. The forced vergence cover test and phoria adapta- tion[J]. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt,2007,27(5):461-472.
  • 7Gurbal N,Damari D. Four methods of phoria tesiting evaluated in aclinical setting[J]. Optometry, 2005,76(6) : 364.
  • 8Lyon DW, Goss DA, Homer D, et al. Normative data for modified Thorington phorias and prism bar vergences from the Benton-IU study[J]. Optometry, 2005,76 (10) : 593-599.
  • 9Roserdield 1VI. Tonic vergence and vergence adaptation[J]. Optom Vis Sci,1997,74(5) :303-328.
  • 10Howarth PA, Heron G. Repeated measures of horizontal heterophoria [J]. Optom Vis Sci,2000,77(11):616-619.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部