摘要
目的:比较利福平胶囊和利福平注射液治疗肺结核的临床疗效。方法:120例肺结核患者分为观察组和对照组,每组60例,两组患者均采用2HRZE/4HR标准化疗方案治疗,观察组给予利福平注射液治疗,对照组给予利福平胶囊治疗。结果:疗程结束时观察组和对照组痰菌阴转率分别为91.7%、78.3%;病灶吸收率分别为86.7%、61.7%,两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组空洞闭合、缩小例数及不良反应发生率比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:利福平注射液治疗肺结核疗效显著,副作用小,有较好的临床应用价值。
Objective:To observed and compared the clinical effectiveness of pulmonary tuberculosis curing by rifampicin caps and rifampicin injection. Method:One hundred and twenty cases of pulmonary tuberculosis patients were divided into the observation group(n=60) and the control group(n=60),all the cases were treated with 2HREZ/4HR standard chemotherapy formula. The observation group were treated by Rifampicin Injection during the intensify phase,while the control group were treated by taking Rifampicin Capsules. Result:The sputum negative conversion rates were 91.7%and 78.3%in the observation group and the control group respectively,and the lesions absorption rates of two groups were 86.7%and 61.7%respectively,and the difference between the two groups were all statistically significant(P〈0.05). It had no significant difference between two groups with the hole closed and narrow cases,incidence of adverse reactions. Conclusion:Rifampicin injection has a good curative effect in treating pulmonary tuberculosis,which fewer adverse reactions. It is of great value in the clinical practice.
出处
《中外医学研究》
2014年第15期32-34,共3页
CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
关键词
利福平胶囊
利福平注射液
肺结核
Rifampicin Capsules
Rifampicin Injection
Pulmonary tuberculosis