期刊文献+

论教师方法依赖的误区及其超越 被引量:8

On the Misunderstanding and Solution of the Teachers' Method Dependence
原文传递
导出
摘要 实践中教师存在着对于固定性、模式性、程序性以及确定性方法的过度依赖、盲目依赖以及机械依赖。识读教师深陷方法依赖的根本缘由在于:统一教育管理体制的钳制、教学理论中"方法文化"的滥觞以及教学实践场域中的惯习回溯。超越方法依赖误区的策略,将方法纳入教师自身研究之内,将方法嵌入课堂情境之中以及让方法融入学科知识之中等。 There are more method dependence, blind dependence and mechanical dependence on the teaching method of the fixity, pattern, procedural, and certainty in teachers group. The fundamental reasons for this pedagogical phenomenon are that: the bound of the unified education management system, much more of the "method culture" of the teaching study as well as the teacher' s field habits in classroom practice. The strategies to resolve this misunderstanding are as follows: teacher's research on method, putting the method being embedded in the teaching situation and integrating the subject knowledge with the methods.
作者 张良 李宝敏
出处 《教师教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第3期7-11,6,共6页 Teacher Education Research
基金 华东师范大学"博士研究生学术新人奖"基金资助项目 "华东师范大学教师教育优势学科平台学术团队项目--终身学习视野下教师学习力诊断与干预研究"课题成果
关键词 方法 教学方法 方法依赖 教师学习 method teaching methods method dependence teacher study
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1P. Freire, & D. A. Maccdo. Dialogue: Culture, language, and race. Harvard Educational Review. 1995, 65 ( 3 ).
  • 2张华.反思对话教学的技术主义倾向[J].教育发展研究,2011,31(20):64-69. 被引量:51
  • 3John Dewey. Democracy and education [M]. New York: the free press, 1916:173 - 174. 173 - 174. 173 - 174. 171 - 172.
  • 4William E. Doll, Jr. Beyond methods? Teaching as an aesthetic and spiritfull quest [ A]. E. Mirochnik & D. Sherman. Passion and pedagogy: relation, creation, and transformation in teaching [ C ]. New York: Peter Lang. 2002 : 127 - 151.
  • 5F. Michael Connelly, Dorothy Jean. Clandinin, Teachers as curriculum planners: narratives of experience [ M]. NY: Teachers College Columbia University Press, 1998. 140. 7.
  • 6(加)迈克尔·富兰.教育变革新意义[M].赵中建等译,北京:教育科学出版社,2005:20.
  • 7William E. Doll, Jr, M. Jayne Fleener, John St. Julien. Chaos, complexity, curriculum, and Culture : a conversation [ M]. New York: Peter Lang. 2005 : 26 - 27.
  • 8William E. Doll, Jr. Complexity and the culture of curriculum [ J ]. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2008 (40) 1: 190-212.
  • 9(捷)夸美纽斯.大教学论[M].傅任敢译,北京:人民教育出版社,1999:90.1.
  • 10(德)赫尔巴特.普通教育学[A].李其龙,郭官义.赫尔巴特文集(教育学卷一)[C].杭州:浙江教育出版社,2002:80-104.

二级参考文献13

  • 1张华,石伟平,马庆发.《课程流派研究》,山东教育出版社2000年版,第93页.
  • 2Doll, W. E., Jr. The Culture of Method[A]. In Doll, W. E., Jr., Fleener, M. J., Trueit, D., & St. Julien, J. (eds.) Chaos, Complexity, Curricu- lum, and Culture[C]. A Conversation. New York: Peter Lang.2005.
  • 3[美]奥苏伯尔,等.教育心理学--认知观点[M].佘星南,宋钧译.北京:人民教育出版社1994,24-31.
  • 4Aronowitz, S. Paulo Freire's Radical Democratic Humanism [A]. In P. McLaren & P. Leonard.Paulo Freire: A Critical Encounter [C]. London: Routledge, 1993.8.
  • 5Freire, P. & Macedo, D. A Dialogue: Culture, Language, and Race[J]. Harvard Educational Review. 1995,65 (3).
  • 6Macedo, D. & Ana Mafia Araujo Frcire (Mis)Understanding Paulo Freire. In Richardson, V. Handbook of Research on Teaching[M]. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. 2001.108, 109, 378, 382, 380, 379, 382, 384.
  • 7[美]约翰·杜威 姜文闵 译.我们怎样思维·经验与教育[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1991.228-229.
  • 8张华.对话教学:涵义与价值[J].全球教育展望,2008,37(6):7-16. 被引量:155
  • 9王策三.“新课程理念”“概念重建运动”与学习凯洛夫教育学[J].课程.教材.教法,2008,28(7):3-21. 被引量:82
  • 10张华.试论教学方法的理智传统[J].全球教育展望,2009,38(6):7-16. 被引量:17

共引文献83

同被引文献76

引证文献8

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部