期刊文献+

语言符号观的认知视角研究 被引量:20

On the Study of Linguistic Sign from Cognitive Perspective
原文传递
导出
摘要 索绪尔在研究语言任意性的同时观察到语言的交际功能决定了语言一定具有相对理据性,即认知作用于语言;学界普遍认可的弱版萨丕尔-沃尔夫假说认为语言可能影响我们的记忆、感知和思维,即语言影响认知。基于以上两个基本观点,当代的语言符号认知视角研究尝试回答:语言在多大程度上或有多少部分具有理据性?并且借助认知的"交换机"功能研究语言和其他人文因素的互动关系。语言符号的认知观阐述了构式的符号属性,引入语法隐喻和语法转喻这两大认知动因来解决句法和语义之间的冲突问题。本文对语言和认知互动活动提出了一些假设,有待基于语料的理论论证。 Along with arbitrariness, Saussure observed the communicative function of language suggests that language is relatively motivated, viz, cognition impacts language; universally accepted weak Sapir-Whorf hypothesis implies that language indeed may have an effect on our memory, perception, and thought, viz, language influences cognition. Based upon the above two guiding worldviews, contemporary studies of linguistic sign from cognitive perspective try to answer this question "To what degree and/ or how much is language actually motivated conceptually?". Besides, via the "switchboard" function of cognition, the interaction between language and other human systems is studied. The cognitive view of linguistic sign clarifies the semiotic nature of construction, and introduces the two cognitive bases of grammatical metaphor and grammatical metonymy to solve the conflict between syntax and semantics. Finally in the paper, the interaction between language and cognition is postulated, which needs future corpus- based theoretical justification.
作者 张松松
出处 《中国外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期46-53,共8页 Foreign Languages in China
基金 江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学基金项目"句法和语义互动的隐喻和转喻视角"(2012SJD740039)的阶段性成果
关键词 语言符号 语言理据性 萨丕尔一沃尔夫假说 认知动因 linguistic sign linguistic motivation Sapir-Whorf hypothesis cognitive basis
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Baicchi & Annalisa. Metaphoric motivation in grammatical structure: The caused-motion construction from the perspective of the Lexical- Constructional Modal [A]. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (eds). Motivation in Grammar and the Lexicon (Human Cognitive Processing 27) [C]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins, 2011: 149-169.
  • 2Brdar, Mario. Metonymy in Grammar: Towards Motivating Extensions of Grammatical Categories and Constructions [M]. Osijek: Faculty of Philosophy, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University, 2007.
  • 3Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó. The (non-) metonymic use of plase names in English, German, Hungarian, and Croatian [A].In K. -U. Panther & L. Thornburg & A. Barcelona(eds).Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar [C]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2009: 229-258.
  • 4Chomsky N. Lectures on Government and Binding [M]. Dordrecht: Foris, 1981.
  • 5Evans, Vyvyan. Review of Cognitive Linguistics [D/OL]. Lynn Nadel. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science [C]. John Wiley & Sons, 2012. http://www.vyvevans.net/ CogLingReview.pdf.
  • 6Evans V. & Green M. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction [M]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006.
  • 7Gibbs, R. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding [M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
  • 8Kovecses, Z. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction (2nd ed) [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
  • 9Lakoff, G. Women, Fire, and Dangerous things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind [M]. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1987.
  • 10Lakoff, George. The contemporary theory of metaphor [A].In Raymond Gibbs(ed). Metaphor and Thought (2nd ed) [C]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993: 202-251.

二级参考文献68

共引文献72

同被引文献200

引证文献20

二级引证文献116

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部