期刊文献+

碳税与排放权交易制度比较及碳税实施问题研究 被引量:7

原文传递
导出
摘要 碳税制度和碳排放权交易制度是环境经济学中两种最为重要的市场减排激励手段,本文基于中国的减排实践比较了两种制度各自的优劣,认为碳税制度更具有实践意义。同时,进一步分析在碳税政策实施中存在的诸如税率设置、课税范围、开征时机等五大问题,形成如下结论:碳税与排放权交易制度需要组合使用;碳税开征时机需要一个触发条件;在课税时象上要保证以碳排放的能源消费环节不偏离;税率可由10--29.5元/吨逐渐提高至519--648元/吨。
出处 《财政研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第5期32-36,共5页 Public Finance Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献32

  • 1陈文颖,高鹏飞,何建坤.二氧化碳减排对中国未来GDP增长的影响[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2004,44(6):744-747. 被引量:87
  • 2范金,郑庆武,王艳,袁小慧.完善人民币汇率形成机制对中国宏观经济影响的情景分析——一般均衡分析[J].管理世界,2004,20(7):29-42. 被引量:83
  • 3王灿,陈吉宁,邹骥.基于CGE模型的CO_2减排对中国经济的影响[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2005,45(12):1621-1624. 被引量:190
  • 4Cao et al. (2007), "Essays on Environmental Tax Policy Analysis: Dynamic Computable General Equihbrium Approaches Applied to China," Harvard Public Policy Ph.D. thesis, Boston.
  • 5Cao, J. , R. Garbaccio and M. Ho (2009) "Benefits and Costs of SO2 Abatement Policies in China," Review of Environmental Economies and Policy, Vol 3, No. 2, pp. 231 -250.
  • 6Cao, J. , M. Ho and D. Jorgenson (2009) "The Local and Global Benefits of Green Tax Pohcies in China," Review of Environmental Economic and Policy, Vol 3, No. 2, pp. 189 -208.
  • 7Edenhofer, O. , R. pietzcker, M. Kalkuhl and E. Kriegler, (2008), "Taxation Instruments for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emission, and Comparison with Quantity Instruments," Draft Paper prepared for the midterm review of the project "China Economics of Climate Change" on December 14 - 15, 2008 in Beijing, China.
  • 8Goulder, L , ( 1995), "Environmental Taxation and the ' Double Dividend' : A Reader' s Guide," International Tax and Public Finance, August, Vol 2, No. 2, pp. 157-183.
  • 9Metcalf G. and D. Weisbach, (2009), "The Design of a Carbon Tax," Harvard Environmental Law Review, Vol 33, No. 2, 499 - 506.
  • 10Nordhaus W. , (2006) , " After Kyoto: Alternative Mechanisms to Control Global Warming," AEA Papers and Proceedings, Vol 96, No. 2, 31 -34.

共引文献226

同被引文献183

引证文献7

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部