期刊文献+

宁夏重要规划和重大建设项目科技进步影响评价指标体系设计

Design on Evaluation System for Impact of Scientific and Technological Progress of Ningxia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2011年宁夏以地方立法的形式规定建立科技进步影响评价制度,这是宁夏为破解科技进步难题率先在全国进行的重大创新。设计一套科学合理的科技进步影响评价指标体系作为实施科技进步影响评价制度的必要前提,对于加快落实《宁夏实施<中华人民共和国科学技术进步法>办法》中关于建立科学技术进步影响评价制度条款,提高宁夏重大规划和项目实施科技进步成效具有积极的推动作用。 Ningxia established a technological progress impact assessment system in the form of local legislation in 2011. It is the first major innovation in China for Ningxia to deal with the problem of technological progress fatigue. Taking important planning and major projects as the object of evaluation, the paper analyzes the impact of scientific and technological progress from the aspects of project goals design, strategic planning, management, implementation and results, which can provide scientific tools to improve the assessment work of impact of scientific and technological progress. It is helpful to monitor the full implementation of important planning and major project, give full play to accelerate the implementation of important planning and major project in promoting scientific and technological progress.
出处 《科技管理研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第11期50-52,56,共4页 Science and Technology Management Research
基金 宁夏软科学项目"宁夏重要规划和重大建设项目科技进步影响评价制度研究"(2011010) 国家软科学研究计划项目"宁夏科技规划实施效果评价体系研究"(2012GXS2D025)
关键词 科技进步影响评价 重要规划 重大建设项目 宁夏 impact assessment of scientific and technological progress index system Ningxia
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献17

  • 1夏维力,吕晓强.基于BP神经网络的企业技术创新能力评价及应用研究[J].研究与发展管理,2005,17(1):50-54. 被引量:73
  • 2李向波,李叔涛.基于创新过程的企业技术创新能力评价研究[J].中国软科学,2007(2):139-142. 被引量:39
  • 3Breal, Jonathan D. Three Bush Administration Management Reform Initiatives: The President's Management Agenda, Freedom to Manageme Legislative Proposals, and the Program Assessment Rating Tool[J]. Public Administration Review, 2007(Junuary/Feburary): 21-26.
  • 4Gilmour J B. Implementing OMB's Program Assessment Rating Tool(PART): Meeting the Challenges of Integrating Budget and Performance[R]. IBM Center for the Business of Government, Washington, DC. 2006.
  • 5Mullen P R. Performance-based Budgeting: The Contribution of the Program Assessment Rating Tool[J]. Public Budgeting & Finance, 2006(Winter): 79-88.
  • 6Office of Management and Budget, Guide to the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART)JR]. 2007: 7.
  • 7Office of Management and Budget, Budget of the United States Government[R]. Fiscal Year 2008, Analytical Perspective, 2006.
  • 8Guide to the Program Assessment Rating Tool (2007年 ).
  • 9Guide to the Program Assessment Rating Tool (2006--2007).
  • 10刘慧玲.西部大中型企业自主创新能力评价及提升研究[J].工业技术经济,2007,26(8):58-62. 被引量:12

共引文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部