期刊文献+

康复机器人训练对脑卒中患者偏瘫上肢运动功能恢复的疗效评估 被引量:4

Evaluation to Efficiency of Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation Training for Recovery of Upper Limb's Motor Function of Patients with Hemiplegia after Stroke
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:观察康复机器人对脑卒中偏瘫患者上肢运动功能的恢复效果及对上肢神经传导速度的影响。方法:将60例患者随机分为对照组(30例)和试验组(30例),对照组给予常规肢体功能训练,包括运动疗法(PT)和作业治疗(0T);试验组除常规肢体功能训练外,还进行上肢康复机器人训练。两组患者每项训练各进行30min,每天1次,每周5次,4周为一个疗程,两组患者均在训练前、训练后2周及训练后4周时分别进行手握力评定、改良Ashworth评分(MAs)、上肢神经传导速度及运动力指数(MI)评估偏瘫患者的上肢功能。结果:训练前,两组患者手握力、改良Ashworth评定(MAS)、上肢神经传导速度及运动力指数(MI)评分差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。训练4周后,两组患者的手握力及MI评分均较训练前显著改善(P=0.01),试验组优于对照组(P〈0.01);试验组上肢神经传导速度和肘、腕屈肌MAS较训练前有均有显著好转(P〈0.01),对照组较训练前亦有改善(P〈0.05),试验组上肢神经传导速度相比对照组有显著改善(P〈0.01),试验组肘、腕屈肌MAS较对照组亦有改善(P〈0.05)。结论:康复机器人结合常规肢体功能训练能更有效地促进脑卒中偏瘫患者上肢功能的恢复,并有效降低肌痉挛及改善上肢神经传导速度。 Objective: To observe the recovery efficiency of rehabilitation robots on the upper limb's motor function and the influence on upper limb's nerve conduction velocity of patients with hemiplegia after stroke. Methods: 60 cases of patients were randomly divided into control group (30 cases) and experimental group (30 cases), the control group treated by conventional limb's function training, including PT and OT; except conventional function training, the experimental group also treated by robot-assisted rehabilitation training to upper limb. Two groups of patients were both trained for 30min in each training, 1 time per day, 5 times per week and 4 Weeks as a course of treatment, and finally evaluated the hand grip, MAS scores, up- per limb's nerve conduction velocity and MI scores to assess patients' upper limb's function at the time of before training, 2 weeks and 4 weeks after training. Results: Before training, the hand grip, MAS scores, upper limb's nerve conduction velocity and MI scores of two groups had no statistical difference (P〉0.05). 4 weeks after trainirig, the hand grip and MI scores were improved (P〈0.05), and that of experimental group was better than con- trol group (P〈0.01); the upper limb's never conduction velocity and elbow and wrist flexors were all turned better (P〈0.01), those of control group were also improved (P〈0.05), but the upper limb's never conduction velocity of experimental group was significantly better than control group (P〈 0.01) and the elbow and wrist flexors of experimental group were also much improved than control group (P〈0.05). Conclusion: Rehabilitation ro- bots combined with conventional limb's function training can much effectively improve the recovery of upper limb's function of patients with hemiplegia after stroke, and effectively decrease myospasm and improve upper limb's never conduction velocity.
出处 《按摩与康复医学》 2014年第6期224-227,共4页 Chinese Manipulation and Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词 上肢康复机器人 脑卒中 偏瘫 肌痉挛 神经传导速度 upper limb rehabilitation robot stroke hemiplegia myospasm never conduction velocity
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1National Center for Health Statistics (US). Health, United States, 2009: With Special Feature on Medical Technology[R]. Hyatts- ville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics (US),2010.
  • 2Masiero S, Armani M, Rosati G, et al. Upper-limb robot-assisted therapy in rehabilitation of acute stroke patients: focus review and results of new randomized controlled trial[J]. J Rehabil Res Dev, 2011,48(4):355-366.
  • 3Burgar CG, Lum PS, Scremin AM, et al. Robot-assisted up- per-limb therapy in acute rehabilitation setting following stroke: Department of Veterans Affairs multisite clinical trial[J]. J Reha- bil Res Dev,2011,48(4):445-458.
  • 4Hsieh YW, Wu CY, Liao WW, et al. Effects of treatment intensity in upper limb robot-assisted therapy for chronic stroke: a pilot ran- domized controlled trial[J]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2011,25 (6): 503 -511.
  • 5梁天佳,吴小平,莫明玉.上肢康复机器人训练对偏瘫患者上肢功能恢复的影响[J].中国康复医学杂志,2012,27(3):254-256. 被引量:39
  • 6Mazzoleni S, Crecchi R, Posteraro F, et al. Robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation in chronic stroke patients[J]. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc,2013,2013:886-889.
  • 7各类脑血管疾病诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):379-380. 被引量:33037
  • 8Panarese A, Colombo R, Sterpi I, et al. Tracking motor improve- ment at the substask level during robot-aided neurorehabilitation of stroke patients[J]. Neurorehabilil Neural Repair,2013,26(7): 822-833.
  • 9Tombari D, Loubinoux I, Pariente J, et al. A longitudinal fMRI study: in recovering and then in clinically stable sub-cortical stoke patients[J]. Neuroimage,2004,23(3):827-839.
  • 10van Vliet P, Pelton TA, Hollands KL, et al. Neuroscience Findings on Coordination of Reaching to Grasp an Object: Implications for Research[J]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair,2013,27(7):622-635.

二级参考文献69

  • 1毕胜,纪树荣,顾越,瓮长水.Fugl-Meyer上肢运动功能评分与上肢运动功能状态评分的响应性研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2006,21(2):118-120. 被引量:135
  • 2各类脑血管疾病诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):379-380. 被引量:33037
  • 3南登崑.康复医学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:44.
  • 4Tombari D,Loubinoux I,Pariente J,et al.A longitudinal fMRI study:in recovering and then in clinically stable sub-cortical stroke patients[J].Neuroimage,2004,23:827-839.
  • 5Wise SP.Motor control[J].Encyclopedia of the Human Brain,2001,3(1):1-21.
  • 6Aisen FL,Krebs HI,Hogan N,et al.The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke[J].Arch Neurol,1997,54:443-446.
  • 7Volpe BT,Krebs HI,Hogan N,et al.A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: Robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation[J].Neurology,2000,54:1938-1944.
  • 8Volpe BT,Krebs HI,Hogan N,et al.Robot training enhanced motor outcome in patients with stroke maintained over 3years[J].Neurology,1999,53:1874-1876.
  • 9Fasoli SE,Krebs HI,Stein J,et al.Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke[J].Arch Phys Med Rehabil,2003,84:477-482.
  • 10Lum PS,Burgar CG,Shor PC,et al.Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upperlimb motor function after stroke[J].Arch Phys Med Rehabil,2002,83:952-959.

共引文献33081

同被引文献38

引证文献4

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部