期刊文献+

重新审思卡尔纳普与库恩的科学观

Rethinking the Views of Science of Carnap and Kuhn
原文传递
导出
摘要 近年来,卡尔纳普与库恩的科学观之间的关系得到重新认识。卡尔纳普不仅对库恩的《科学革命的结构》高度认可,而且在他的哲学中蕴含着强烈的后实证主义思想。特别是,卡尔纳普与库恩在科学观上显示出高度的类似性:一方面,库恩的范式类似于卡尔纳普的科学理论;另一方面,库恩对辞典构造的看法又与卡尔纳普对语言框架的认识极为相像,因此,他们对科学革命自然会有几乎同样的看法,均认为科学革命主要通过范式(理论)变革或辞典(语言)改变的方式出现。 In recent years the relationship between the views of science of Carnap and Kuhn has been reconsidered. Carnap not only appreciates highly Kuhn's The Structure of Scientifi c Revolutions, but also entails rich ideas of post-positivism in his philosophy. In particular, the views of science of Carnap and Kuhn share considerable similarities. On the one hand, Kuhn's paradigms are akin to Carnap's scientifi c theories. On the other hand, Kuhn's ideas about the construction of dictionaries are extremely analogous to Carnap's views of linguistic frameworks. It is not at all surprising, therefore, that their characterizations of scientifi c revolutions are almost identical. Both ofthem claim that scientifi c revolutions take place either by the change of paradigm(theory), or by the change of dictionary(language).
作者 崔凡
出处 《自然辩证法通讯》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第3期23-28,125-126,共6页 Journal of Dialectics of Nature
关键词 卡尔纳普 库恩 科学观 类似性 Carnap Kuhn View of science Similarities
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Irzik, G., Griinberg, T., Carnap and Kuhn: Arch Enemies or Close Allies? [J]. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1995, 46(3): 285-307.
  • 2Reisch, G. A., Did Kulan Kill Logical Empiricism? [J]. Philosophy of Science, 1991, 58(2): 264-277.
  • 3Earman, J., Carnap, Kuhn, and the Philosophy of Scientific Methodology [A]. Horwich, P. (ed.), Worm Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of Science [C]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993, 9-36.
  • 4Friedman, M., Kuhn and Logical Empiricism [A]. Nickles, T.(ed.), Thomas Kuhn [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, 19-44.
  • 5Irzik, G., Carnap and Kuhn: A Belated Encounter[A]. Gardenfors, P., Wolefiski, J., Kijania-Placek, K.(eds.), In the Scope of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: Volume Two of the llth International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science [C]. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002, 603-620.
  • 6Axtell, G. S., In the Tracks of the Historicist Movement: Re-assessing the Carnap-Kuhn Connection [J]. Studies in History and Philosophy oSeience. 1993,24 ( 1 ) : 119-146.
  • 7Uebel, T., Carnap and Kuhn: On the Relation between the Logic of Science and the History of Science EJ]. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 2011, 42(1): 129-140.
  • 8Carnap, R., Replies and Systematic Expositions [A]. Schilpp, P. A. (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap [C]. La Salle:Open Court, 1963, 859-1013.
  • 9Camap, R., The Logical Structure of the World[M]. George, R.(trans.), Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969, viii-ix.
  • 10Camap, R., The Methodological Character of Theoretical Concepts [A]. Feigl, H., Scriven, M.(eds.), The Foundation of Science and the Concepts of Psychology and Psychoanalysis(Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 1)[C]. Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press, 1962.

共引文献340

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部