期刊文献+

System deployment optimization in architecture design 被引量:2

System deployment optimization in architecture design
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Optimization of architecture design has recently drawn research interest. System deployment optimization (SDO) refers to the process of optimizing systems that are being deployed to activi- ties. This paper first formulates a mathematical model to theorize and operationalize the SDO problem and then identifies optimal so- lutions to solve the SDO problem. In the solutions, the success rate of the combat task is maximized, whereas the execution time of the task and the cost of changes in the system structure are mini- mized. The presented optimized algorithm generates an optimal solution without the need to check the entire search space. A novel method is finally proposed based on the combination of heuristic method and genetic algorithm (HGA), as well as the combination of heuristic method and particle swarm optimization (HPSO). Experi- ment results show that the HPSO method generates solutions faster than particle swarm optimization (PSO) and genetic algo- rithm (GA) in terms of execution time and performs more efficiently than the heuristic method in terms of determining the best solution. Optimization of architecture design has recently drawn research interest. System deployment optimization (SDO) refers to the process of optimizing systems that are being deployed to activi- ties. This paper first formulates a mathematical model to theorize and operationalize the SDO problem and then identifies optimal so- lutions to solve the SDO problem. In the solutions, the success rate of the combat task is maximized, whereas the execution time of the task and the cost of changes in the system structure are mini- mized. The presented optimized algorithm generates an optimal solution without the need to check the entire search space. A novel method is finally proposed based on the combination of heuristic method and genetic algorithm (HGA), as well as the combination of heuristic method and particle swarm optimization (HPSO). Experi- ment results show that the HPSO method generates solutions faster than particle swarm optimization (PSO) and genetic algo- rithm (GA) in terms of execution time and performs more efficiently than the heuristic method in terms of determining the best solution.
出处 《Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics》 SCIE EI CSCD 2014年第2期237-248,共12页 系统工程与电子技术(英文版)
基金 supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(71171197) the National Basic Research Program of China(973 Program)(613154)
关键词 architecture design system deployment optimization heuristic. architecture design, system deployment, optimization,heuristic.
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1IEEE Architecture Working Group. IEEE recommended practice for architectural description. New York: IEEE. 1998.
  • 2A. H. Levis. L. W. Wagenhals. C4ISR architectures I: developing a process for architecture design. Systems Engineering. 2000.3(4): 225-247.
  • 3L. W. Wagenhals, I. Shin. D. Kim, et al. C41SR architectures II: a structured analysis approach for architecture design. Systems Engineering, 2000. 3(4): 248-287.
  • 4L. W. Wagenhals, S. Haider, A. H. Levis. Synthesizing executable models of object oriented architectures. Systems Engineering, 2003, 6(4): 266-300.
  • 5H. Philipp. L. Pascal. From integrated architecture to integrated executable architecture. Proc. of the 19th IEEE International Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, 2010: 148-153.
  • 6DoD Architecture Framework Working Group. DoD architecture framework version 1.0 volume I: definitions and guidelines (draft). Washington D. c.: Department of Defense, 2003.
  • 7L. Falzon. Using Bayesian network analysis to support centre of gravity analysis in military planning. European Journal of Operational Research. 2006, 170(2): 629-643.
  • 8L. Zhang. B. Michell. C. Janczura. COAST - an operational planning tool for course of action development and analysis. Proc. of the 9th International Commend & Control Research and Technology Symposium, 2004.
  • 9X. X. Zhang, S. Tang. A. M. Luo, et al. Method of system deployment optimization in architecture design based on GA. Proc. of the 14th International Conference on Informatics and Semiotics in Organizations, 2013: 206-214.
  • 10S. B. Si. H. Y. Dui, X. B. Zhao, et al. Integrated importance measure of component states based on loss of system performance.IEEE Trans. on Reliability, 2012,61(1): 192-202.

同被引文献67

  • 1谢恺,韩裕生,薛模根,周一宇,安玮.天基红外低轨星座的传感器管理方法[J].宇航学报,2007,28(5):1331-1336. 被引量:11
  • 2罗鹏程,傅攀峰,周经伦.武器装备体系作战能力评估框架[J].系统工程与电子技术,2005,27(1):72-75. 被引量:87
  • 3Chalmeta R, Pazos V. A step -by-step methodology for enter-prise interoperability projects[J]. Enterprise Information Sys-tems , 2014. D01:10. 1080/17517575. 2013. 879212.
  • 4Browning T R. Managing complex project process models with aprocess architecture framework [ J]. International Journal ofProject Management, 2014, 32(2): 229 .- 241.
  • 5Dabkowski M, Valerdi R,Farr J. Exploiting architectural com-munities in early life cycle cost estimation[J]. Procedia ComputerScience, 2014,28 : 95 - 102.
  • 6Davendralingam N,DeLaurentis D. An analytic portfolio ap-proach to system of systems evolutions[J]. Procedia ComputerScience , 2014, 28 : 711 -719.
  • 7Grzesik N,Sobolewski M. Project of on-board control systemwith air-task efficiency estimation subsystem based on fuzzy logicfor unmanned combat aerial vehicle rockets[J]. Aviation,2014,18Cl): 9-12.
  • 8Ma G P,Sha J C, Chen C. War design engineering based on dy-namic Bayesian network and blackboard mechanism[C] // Proc.of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computa-tion Technology and Automation, 2010: 1151 - 1154.
  • 9Ge B F, Hipel K W, Yang K W. A novel executable modelingapproach for system-of-systems architecture[J], IEEE SystemsJournal, 2014,8(1):4 - 13.
  • 10Khazra G, Abadi A H, Abedini S J M. Creating an executablemodel in order to evaluate non-functional requirements in service-oriented enterprise architecture[J]. Asian Journal of Research inBusiness Economics and Management. 2014,4(3) : 416 - 429.

引证文献2

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部