期刊文献+

R3视域算法与参考面算法的对比研究 被引量:4

ContrastStudy of R3 and Reference Plane Viewshed Algorithm
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在地形可视性分析中,R3视域算法和参考面算法是两种重要的算法。在对两种算法的计算结果进行对比后,可以发现参考面算法的计算结果总要比R3算法的结果偏高。本文在此对比的基础上继续深入分析造成这种结果差异的本质原因,进一步解释了这种差异多表现在山体和沟壑等地形起伏较大的区域原因,并得出结论:这种结果差异不能作为两种算法精度相互评价的依据。 As we know,R3 and reference plane are important viewshed algorithm in visibility analysis. After compared with two algorithms in this paper,we find that the result computed by reference plane viewshed algorithm is higher than by R3 viewshed algorithm. Based on the contrast of these results,the key reasons caused the results' difference will be analyzed in this paper. Finally,there is a conclusions: if evaluating the two algorithms' accuracy mutually,the difference can't be become the reason,for example R3 algorithm is not more accurate than reference because of the difference.
出处 《测绘与空间地理信息》 2014年第5期36-38,共3页 Geomatics & Spatial Information Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(41071244)资助
关键词 R3算法 参考面算法 地形可视性分析 算法对比 R3 algorithm reference plane algorithm DTA algorithms contrast
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献3

  • 1Branko Kaucic,Borut Zalik.An Overview of Visibility Problem Algorithms in 1,5D[C].Proceedings of the 10th International Conference in Central Europe on Computer Graphics,Visualization and Computer Vision'2002,Skala V.(ed),2002.241-247.
  • 2Branko Kauci,Borut Zalik.Comparison of Viewshed Algorithms on Regular Spaced Points[C].International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques.Proceedings of the 18th Spring Conference on Computer Graphics,Budmerice,Slovakia.SESSION:Geometrics Modeling and Meshes,2002.
  • 3Wm Randolph Franklin,Clark K.Ray,Shashank Mehta.Geometric Algorithms for Sitting of Air Defense Missile Batteries,Research Project for Battelle[R].Columbus Division,Contract Number DAAL03-86-D-0001,Delivery Order Number 2756,1994.

共引文献40

同被引文献7

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部