摘要
刑法中的法律拟制与注意规定具有补充主要规定不足的作用,存在构成形式上的一致性;同时,它们所规定的内容与基本规定的关系、适用条件以及功能等方面均存在较大差异。通过总结和反思一些学者归纳的区分方法,根据刑法中法律拟制与注意规定的联系和区别,可以综合三种较为妥适的方法:在某条款不存在与存在情况下所得出的结论是否相同、法条所蕴涵的立法意图,以及某条款是否具有普遍适用性或可推广性,以准确区分刑法中的法律拟制与注意规定条款。
Apart from some similarities, legal fiction and provision of attention have significant diversities in the aspect of relation between stipulated content and basic provisions, application condition and functions. Therefore, legal fiction from provision of attention could be distinguished through these aspects: whether the conclusion made under circumstance of non - exist of this provision could be consistent with the exist of the provision; what is the legislative intention of the provision; and whether the provision has universal applicability and popularity.
出处
《北京社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第3期99-105,共7页
Social Sciences of Beijing
基金
上海市高校一流学科(法学)建设计划项目
关键词
法律拟制
注意规定
立法意图
普遍适用性
legal fiction
provision of attention
legislative intent
universal applicability