期刊文献+

多维度的选举权——基于霍菲尔德权利理论的一个分析 被引量:3

The Dimensions of the Right to Vote :An Analysis within the Framework of Hohfeld's Theory of Rights
下载PDF
导出
摘要 选举权包含多种法规范上的地位和关系,可看作一个有关选举的权利束。按照霍菲尔德的权利理论,可以从权力、自由、豁免和求四个维度来理解选举权。在权力维度上,选举权意味着对授权和代表关系的法律控制力,选民行使选举权的结果便是授权和代表关系的形成、变动和消灭。在自由维度上,选举权意味着个人有权自由地行使选举权力,不受国家、组织和他人的干涉。在豁免维度上,选举权意味着公民有不受约束的选举自由,国家没有不当干预选举自由的权力。求维度的选举权与其他维度的选举权紧密相连,它以选举权之权力、自由和豁免三素为主张对象,在一定意义上,其他维度的选举权只有与求维度的选举权结合起来,才能变得更有力、更具有可实现性。 The right to vote is a bundle of rights about voting and contains several kinds of legal position and relation. Within the framework of Hohfeld's theory of rights, the right to vote can be seen as a right with four dimensions, namely a right of power, liberty, immunity and claim. The right to vote as a power means a legal controlling power about delegation and representation. Voters' exercising the right of voting power will result in an establishment, a variation or an elimination of delegation and representation. The right to vote as a liberty means that individuals have the right of exercising voting power freely without interference from the State, organizations and other persons. The right to vote as an immunity means that citizens have the right to free elections and the State has no power of interfering free elections. The right to vote as a claim is related with the other dimensions of the right to vote. It is a right of claim about the power, freedom and immunity of voting. In some sense, it is a guarantee of the other dimensions of the right to vote.
作者 张卓明
出处 《南京大学法律评论》 CSSCI 2014年第1期3-14,共12页 Nanjing University Law Review
基金 国家社科基金重大项目“法律文明史”(项目编号11&ZD081)之子项目“现代公法的变革” 国家社科基金青年项目“选举权的法理研究”(项目编号:09CFX015)的成果之一
关键词 选举权 霍菲尔德 权利理论 参政权 Right to Vote Hohfeld Theory of Rights Right to Participate in Government
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献10

  • 1Stephen Holmes & Cass R. Sunstein, The Cost of Rights ,W. W. Norton and Co.Due/Published, (1999), p43.
  • 2Jeremy Waldrom ed. Theories of Rights,Oxford University Press, (1984) ,pp. 2 - 3.
  • 3王涌.[D].中国政法大学,.
  • 4Joseph William Singer, The legal fights debate in analytical jurisprudence from Bentham to Hohfeld, Wisconsin Law Review,November 1982.
  • 5Wesley. N. Hohfeld, Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning, Yale Law Journal, 1919.
  • 6Susan Bandes,The Negative Constitution.A Critique,88 Mich,L,Rev.(1990),2329.
  • 7萧文生 载李建良 简资修.《基本权利侵害之救济》[A].载李建良、简资修.《宪法解释之理论与实务》[C].台湾“中央研究院中山人文社会科学研究所”,1991年出版发行..
  • 8Matthew Diller, Poverty Lawyering in the Golden Age, 93 Mich. L. Rev. 1401, 1428 (1995).
  • 9Cf. Karl Loewenstein, Reflexions on the Value of Constitution in Our Revolutionary Age, in Anold J. Zurcher(hrg. ), Constitutions and Constitutional Trends after World War Ⅱ ,New York, (1959) ,S. 191ff (203ff.).
  • 10徐显明.人权的体系与分类[J].中国社会科学,2000(6):95-104. 被引量:145

共引文献153

同被引文献55

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部