期刊文献+

马尔库塞与哈贝马斯科技发展前景论比较研究

A Comparative Study of Marcuse and Habermas in Their Theories of Scientific and Technological Development Prospects
下载PDF
导出
摘要 马尔库塞在对工具理性和现代科技进行批判的基础上提出了它的解决办法。要消除科技造成的对人的压抑和单向度状态就要超越于工具理性,用新的感性和爱欲解放来进行拯救。哈贝马斯建立起新的合理化框架。新的合理化就是交往合理化,就是强调相互作用的重要意义,恢复生活世界的本来面目。要实现交往合理化就需要建立民主公正的对话秩序,实现话语民主,科技也应当参与其中改变自身过去傲慢的态度,与人们交流关注人们的需要。 By criticizing the instrumental rationality and the modern science and technology,Marcuse comes up with his solutions of the problems.Marcuse believes that in order to remove the depression inflicted on people by science and technology and to eliminate the one dimensional state,we should transcend the instrumental rationality and resort to new sensibility and Eros liberation for salvation. Habermas has established the new rational framework.The new rationality is the communicative rationality,which emphasizes the important significance of interaction and the importance of restoring the true nature of the life world.To bring about the communicative rationality,democratic and j ust dialogue systems should be established.To make the discourse democratic,science should get involved in it by changing its arrogant attitudes and communicating with people in its concern for their needs.
作者 鲁力
出处 《中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2014年第1期131-135,共5页 Journal of China University of Mining & Technology(Social Sciences)
关键词 马尔库塞 哈贝马斯 科技前景 Marcuse Habermas scientific and technological prospects
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1马尔库塞.审美之维[M].李小兵译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1989.
  • 2哈贝马斯.交往行为理论:第一卷[M].曹卫东,泽.上海:上海人民出版社,2004.
  • 3哈贝马斯,郭官义,李黎.理论与实践[M].社会科学文献出版社,2004.251.
  • 4哈贝马斯.作为“意识形态”的技术与科学[M].上海:学林出版社,1999..
  • 5安德鲁·费恩伯格,朱春艳(译).哈贝马斯或马尔库塞:两种类型的批判?[J].马克思主义与现实,2005,57(6):87-96. 被引量:18

二级参考文献2

  • 1Kellner(1984).
  • 2.《海德格尔和马尔库塞:技术的大灾难和技术拯救》[M].Rout]edge,2004..

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部