摘要
按照罗斯等人的观点,亚里士多德在分析实践智慧的形式时运用了"实践三段论"。为了把握实践行动中的逻各斯,亚里士多德提出目标和手段相宜性的"搜索"算法,在现代逻辑中可以用问题求解程序实现。以BDI模型为代表的智能体行动逻辑分析继承了亚氏关于欲望、理性和行动间关系的思想,是亚氏实践性推理的一种现代阐释。但BDI对信念、目标、意图的形式化中存在副作用和冗余等问题,其根源在于对意向性行动的理解不够全面。无论是人类还是人工智能体的行动,情境性、交互性和整体性是其推理的主要特征。
According to Rose and other scholars, Aristotle had used Practical Syllogism when he ana- lyzed the forms of practical wisdom. To understand Logos in actions, he proposed the algorism about coherence between goal and tool, which could be reslized by program of problem solution. BDI ac-cepts Aristotle＇ s idea about relation among desire, goal and action, which can be regarded as a mod- ern explanation of Aristotle＇ s Practical Syllogism. But there are by side-effect and the formalism of BDI, which rooted in the narrow understanding of intention actions. As result of analyzing actions by human being and artificial agent, the conclusion is that circumstance, interaction and unification are characters of practical reasoning.
出处
《重庆理工大学学报（社会科学）》
CAS
2014年第1期31-35,共5页
Journal of Chongqing University of Technology（Social Science）
基金
教育部哲学社会科学后期资助项目"博弈论视域中的意向性行动逻辑"(13JHQ012)
