摘要
近现代时期的中国学者对于西方逻辑方法的认同是建立在对其与西方文化、科学发展关系的深刻反思之上的,他们的目的是希望改变中国落后挨打的命运。因此,在对逻辑方法的价值与作用以及赋予它的历史使命的看法上,胡适、冯友兰、金岳霖三位哲学家都能达成基本的共识,但是在如何发挥逻辑方法的价值、如何实现其使命的具体细节上,他们的思想又存在着诸多差异。通过这三位哲学家的逻辑方法及其运用的比较分析,探讨其不同的价值理念和旨趣导致的差异。
Identification of Chinese scholars to western logic methods is based on the profound reflec- tion of relations between western culture and scientific development in modern times. Their purpose is to transform the fate of Chinese backward situation and his being infringed case. Thus , HU Shi, FENG Youlan, JIN Yuelin can reach a ha.sic consensus to the value, functions of the logic method and its historical mission, but the three philosophers differ in their thoughts of how to play the value of the logic method and how to realize its mission, especially in some details. So this paper illustrates their different value notions and analysis to some problems through identifying the similarities and differences of their logic methods and their applications.
出处
《重庆理工大学学报(社会科学)》
CAS
2014年第1期36-42,共7页
Journal of Chongqing University of Technology(Social Science)
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究项目(11YJA7204000)
关键词
胡适
冯友兰
金岳霖
逻辑方法
HU Shi
FENG Youlan
JIN Yuelin
logic method