期刊文献+

一种新的区间直觉模糊集决策方法:区间证据组合的角度 被引量:8

A new interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets decision-making method: Combining of interval evidence aspect
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于证据理论,提出一种新的区间直觉模糊集决策模型.首先采用区间直觉模糊集表示属性值,将区间直觉模糊数转换为区间BPA;然后利用基于区间数的组合规则进行融合;最后将融合后的区间BPA转换为经典BPA用于决策,可直接方便地实现多属性数据的融合.该模型的优点在于:简单直观,能更有效地反映原始信息的不确定度;通用性好,可以推广到其他区间直觉模糊集的应用领域.算例结果表明了所提出模型的有效性. A new interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets decision-making model based on the evidence theory is proposed. The attribute values of corresponding alternatives in this model are in the form of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers(IVIFN). Firstly, IVIFN is converted into interval basic probability assignment(BPA). Then, the combination rule based on interval BPA is utilized to fuse different attributes. Finally, in order to make the final decision, the fused interval BPAs are transformed into classical BPA. In this way, multi-attribute information can be fused directly. The advantages of the proposed model lie in its simplicity, which better reflects the uncertainty of original data, and universality, which can be expanded to other field of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets easily. A numerical example is used to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
出处 《控制与决策》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第6期1143-1147,共5页 Control and Decision
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(61174022) 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目(NCET-08-0345) 重庆市杰出青年科学基金项目(CSCT 2010BA2003) 上海市青年科技启明星计划项目(09QA1402900) 航空科学基金项目(20090557004) 上海交通大学"晨星学者计划"项目(T241460612) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金项目(XDJK2013B029 XDJK2014C082)
关键词 证据理论 信息融合 区间直觉模糊集 区间证据 多属性决策 evidence theory information fusion interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets(IVIFS) interval-valued evidence multi-attribute decision making
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Atanassov K T.Intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1986, 20(1): 87-86.
  • 2Atanassov K T, Gargov G.Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1989, 31(3): 343-349.
  • 3Dempster A.Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multi-valued mapping[J].Annals of Mathematics and Statistics, 1967, 38(2): 325-339.
  • 4Shafer G.A mathematical theory of evidence[M].Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976: 32-45 .
  • 5邓勇,王栋,李齐,章雅娟.一种新的证据冲突分析方法[J].控制理论与应用,2011,28(6):839-844. 被引量:35
  • 6Guo Hua Wei, Shi Wen Kang, Deng Yong.Evaluating sensor reliability in classification problems based on evidence theory[J].IEEE Trans on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, 2006, 36(5): 970-981.
  • 7Deng Yong, Jiang Wen, Sadiq R.Modeling contaminant intrusion in water distribution networks: A new similaritybased DST method[J].Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38(1): 571-578.
  • 8何友,胡丽芳,关欣,邓勇,韩德强.一种度量广义基本概率赋值冲突的方法[J].中国科学:信息科学,2011,41(8):989-997. 被引量:12
  • 9邓鑫洋,邓勇,章雅娟,刘琪.一种信度马尔科夫模型及应用[J].自动化学报,2012,38(4):666-672. 被引量:38
  • 10Deng Yong, Chan F T S.A new fuzzy dempster MCDM method and its application in supplier selection[J].Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38(8): 9854-9861.

二级参考文献76

共引文献194

同被引文献84

引证文献8

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部