撤销论文及其学术影响研究被引量：46

导出

摘要本文通过Web of Science数据库收集撤销论文,研究了10年间撤销论文的总体分布特征,发现撤销论文分布集中在美国和中国,权威期刊的撤销论文较多;利用生存分析研究了"未被引"、"撤销前引用"及"残留引用"三种引用模式论文的撤销时滞,发现撤销论文的平均撤销时滞为2.76年(约33个月),"未被引"的缺陷论文发表1年后有70%的概率被撤销,而"残留引用"的撤销时滞则很长;对高被引的撤销论文研究发现,撤销论文对科学界的影响不能轻易消退,科学界自我净化的时间成本很高,尤其高被引论文撤销时滞是平均水平的4.3倍;研究高被引撤销论文施引文献的引文动机发现,尽管研究者的引用态度非常谨慎和严谨,但撤销论文仍会误导科学家对研究现状的判断。

作者姚长青田瑞强杨冬雨薛晓丽姜秀兰乔晓东

机构地区中国科学技术信息研究所

出处《中国科技期刊研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第5期595-604,共10页 Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals

关键词论文撤销生存分析撤销时滞学术影响高被引引文动机

分类号 G353.1 [文化科学—情报学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献21

1Sheet F.Errata,Retraction,Duplicate Publication,Comment,Update and Patient Summary Policy for MEDLINE[www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/errata.html].Bethesda (MD):National Library of Medicine (US) ;[EB/OL].2002[updated 27November 2012].
2Nath S B,Marcus S C,Druss B G.Retractions in the research literature:misconduct or mistakes?.Medical Journal of Australia,2006,185(3):152.
3Steen R G.Retractions in the scientific literature:do authors deliberately commit research fraud?.Journal of medical ethics,2011,37(2):113-117.
4Wager E,Williams P.Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008.Journal of medical ethics,2011,37(9):567-570.
5Arst H N.Apathy rewards misconduct-and everybody suffers.Nature,2000,403 (6769):478-478.
6Avery S.Flawed research appalls cancer patient.News & Observer,Raleigh,NC.2011.
7Drury N E,Karamanou D M.Citation of retracted articles:a call for vigilance.Ann Thorac Surg,2009,87(2):670.
8Van Noorden.Science publishing:The trouble with retractions.Nature,2011,478:26-28.
9Oransky I,Marcus A.Retraction Watch.http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com[EB/OL].
10Fang FC,Casadevall A.Retracted science and the retraction index.Infect lmmun,2011,79:3855-3859.

二级参考文献14

1National Library of Medicine. Fact sheet. Errata, retractions, partial retractions, corrected and republished articles, duplicatepublications, comments ( including author replies), updates, patient summaries, and republished (reprinted) articles policy for MEDLINE ( updated 04/06/2010). [ 2011-02-11 ]. http ://www. nlm. nih. gov/pubs/factsheets/errata, html.
2[ 2011-03-02 ]. http ://www. nature, corn/nature/authors.
3ACS. Ethical Guidelines to Publication of Chemical Research. [ 2011-03-02 ]. http ://pubs. acs. org/instructYethic, html.
4Anne Victoria Neale, Justin Northrup, Rhonda Dailey, Ellen Marks, Judith Abrams. Correction and use of biomedical literature affected by scientific misconduct. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2007. 13 : 5 - 24.
5Murat Cokol, Fath Ozbay. Retraction rates are on the rise. EMBO reports, 2008, 9 ( 1 ) : 2.
6Murat Cokol, et al. How many scientific papers should be retracted? EMBO reports, 2007, 8 (5) : 422 -423.
7Larry D Claxton. Scientific authorship Part 1. A window into scientific fraud.'? Mutation Research, 2005, 589 (1) : 17 -30.
8http ://www. sciencedirect, corn/.
9Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal. [ 2011-03-02 1. http:// elsevier, comZwps/find/intro, cws _ home/ Article% 20Withdrawal.
10Scientific plagiarism in India. [ 2011-05-03 ]. http://en. wikipedia, org,/wiki/Scientific_plagiarism_in_India.