期刊文献+

SNIP、SJR及其修正指标SNIP2、SJR2在期刊评价中的应用 被引量:15

原文传递
导出
摘要 以Scopus数据库发布的SNIP、SNIP2、SJR、SJR2及《期刊引证报告》(JCR)为数据源,通过在选择的代表性学科中与JCR评价指标进行相关度分析、对跨学科评价指标SNIP、SNIP2值较高期刊在学科内排名分布差异进行比较和使用。针对国外眼科学者的问卷调查结果作为眼科学期刊真实影响力标准,对Scopus数据库4种评价指标在期刊评价中的准确性进行分析。结果表明4种评价指标在期刊评价中均相关,修正后的SNIP2、SJR2较SNIP、SJR在评价中排除异常值的能力更强,更稳定,在低被引学科中与JCR评价指标的相关性更强,在眼科学期刊评价中SJR2较SJR更为准确。在跨学科期刊评价中,SNIP2较SNIP表现出更好的有效性。
出处 《中国科技期刊研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期833-838,共6页 Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals
基金 河南省哲学社会科学规划项目(No.2012BZH004) 新乡医学院科学研究培育基金(人文社科类)重点项目(No.2013-001)
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 150 million records 121,000 titles 1 5,000 publishers [ EB/OL]. [ 2013 - 9 - 22 ]. http ://www. elsevier, conr/online-tools/scopus.
  • 2Lopez - illesca S C, De Moya-Anegon F, Moed H F. Coverage and citation impact of oncological journals in the Web of Science and Scopus. Journal oflnformetrics, 2008, 2(4): 304-316.
  • 3Gorraiz J, Schloegl C. A bibliometric analysis of pharmacology and pharmacy journals: Scopus versus Web of Science. Journal of Information Science, 2008, 34 (5) : 715 - 725.
  • 4王丽伟,牟冬梅,王伟.Scopus数据库的期刊评价功能及其实证研究[J].情报科学,2009,27(6):864-868. 被引量:11
  • 5Moed H F. Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of lnformetrics, 2010, 4 (3) : 265 - 77.
  • 6Gonz Lez-pereira, Guerrero-bote V P, Moya-aneg N F. A new approach to the metric of journals' scientific prestige: The SJR indicator. Journal of lnformetrics, 2010, 4 ( 3 ) : 379 - 91.
  • 7Butler, D. Free journal-ranking tool enters citation market. Nature, 2008, 451(7174) : 6.
  • 8Raj R G, Zainab A N. Relative measure index: a metric to measure the quality of journals. Scientometrics, 2012, 93 (2) : 305 - 317.
  • 9Leydesdorff L, Opthof T. Scopus's Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) Versus a Journal Impaet Factor Based on Fractional Counting of Citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61 ( 11 ) : 2365 -2369.
  • 10Moed H F. The Source Normalized Impact per Paper Is a Valid and Sophisticated Indicator of Journal Citation Impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62(1) : 211 -213.

二级参考文献69

共引文献159

同被引文献146

  • 1叶继元,朱强.论文评价与期刊评价——兼及核心期刊的概念[J].学术界,2001(3):63-71. 被引量:76
  • 2杜志波,汤先忻.标准化影响因子在不同学科期刊比较中的应用[J].编辑学报,2007,19(2):158-160. 被引量:21
  • 3杜志波,汤先忻.期刊累计影响因子的设计及应用[J].中国科技期刊研究,2007,18(3):428-431. 被引量:5
  • 4Jacso P. Differences in the rank position of journals by Eigenfactor metrics and the five-year impact factor in the Journal Citation Reports and the Eigenfactor Project web site. Online Information Review ,2010,34 ( 3 ) :496 - 508.
  • 5Vanclay JK. Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? Scientometrics ,2012,92 (2) :211 - 238.
  • 6van Nierop E. The introduction of the 5-year impact factor: does it benefit statistics journals? Statistica Neerlandica ,2010,64( 1 ) :71 -76.
  • 7Seglcn PO. Why the impact factor of journals should not he used for evaluating research. BMJ, 1997,314 (7079) :498 - 502.
  • 8Sombatsompop N, Markpin T, Premkamolnetr N. A modified method fur calculating the Impact Factors of journals in ISI Journal Citation Reports: Polymer Science Category in 1997 - 2001. Scientometrics, 2004,60 ( 2 ) : 217 - 235.
  • 9van Leeuwen TN, Moed HF, Reedijk J. Critical comments on Institute for Scientific information impact factors: a sample of inorganic molecular chemistry journals. Journal of Information Science, 1999,25 ( 6 ) :489 - 498.
  • 10Dorta-Gonzalez P, Dorta-Gonzalez MI. Impact maturity times and citation time windows: The 2-year maximum journal impact factor. Journal of Informetrics ,2013,7 ( 3 ) :593 - 602.

引证文献15

二级引证文献91

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部