期刊文献+

经桡动脉行冠状动脉介入过程中小剂量芬太尼联合咪唑安定预防桡动脉痉挛的临床效果 被引量:2

Effect of small dose of fentanyl combined with midazolam on prevention of radial artery spasm during transradial coronary intervention
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨剂量芬太尼联合咪唑安定预防桡动脉痉挛的效果。方法将1 806例经桡动脉行冠状动脉介入手术患者随机分为药物组及对照组。药物组常规给予静脉注射芬太尼及咪唑安定,对照组不给任何药物。记录并比较2组桡动脉痉挛发生率、血管并发症、30 d内患者死亡率、再住院率等指标。结果药物组桡动脉痉挛发生率为2.5%,显著低于对照组的8.8%(P<0.001)。2组患者舒适度有显著差异(P<0.001)。2组患者30 d内死亡率或再住院率无显著差异(P>0.05)。多因素分析结果显示,影响桡动脉痉挛因素主要与性别、身高、肥胖、吸烟、导管使用数量、手术方式及手术复杂程度相关。结论小剂量芬太尼联合咪唑安定能够明显降低桡动脉痉挛的发生率、血管并发症,30 d内死亡率及再住院率并无增加。 Objective To explore the effect of small dose of fentanyl combined with midazo-lam on prevention of radial artery spasm.Methods 1086 patients with elective transradial percuta-neous coronary intervention were randomly divided into medicine group and control group.The medicine group was treated with conventional intravenous injection of fentanyl and midazolam.Inci-dence rate of radial spasm,vascular complications and mortality rate or re-hospitalization rate with-in 30 days were recorded and compared between two groups.Results Incidence rate of radial spasm in medicine group was 2.5%,which was significantly lower than 8.8% in the control group (P 〈0.001).There were no significant differences in aspects of VAS score,mortality rate and re-hos-pitalization rate between two groups.Multivariate analysis showed that there were obvious correla-tion between incidence of radial spasm and gender,height,obesity,smoking,numbers of tubes, surgical way and difficulty of operation.Conclusion Small dose of fentanyl combined with midazo-lam during transradial interventional procedures can significantly reduce the incidence of radial spasm and vascular complications,and it won’t cause increasing of mortality rate and re-hospitalization rate.
出处 《实用临床医药杂志》 CAS 2014年第9期82-84,共3页 Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
基金 国家高科技研究发展计划("863"计划 2006AA02Z4D7)
关键词 芬太尼 咪唑安定 冠脉介入 桡动脉痉挛 fentanyl midazolam percutaneous coronary intervention radial artery spasm
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Hetherington S L, Adam Z, Morley R, et al. Primary percu- taneous coronary intervention for acute ST - segment elevation myocardial infarction: changing patterns of vascular access, ra- dial versus femoral artery[J]. Heart,2009, 95(19): 1612.
  • 2Jolly S S, Yusuf S, Cairns J, et al. Radial versus femoral ac- cess for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL) : a randomized, parallel group, multicentre trial [J ]. Lancet, 2011, 377 (9775) : 1409.
  • 3Ho H H, Jafary F H, Ong P J. Radial artery spasm during transradial cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention: incidence, predisposing factors, prevention, and management[J]. Cardiovasc Revasc Med, 2012, 13(3) : 193.
  • 4Deftereos S, Giannopoulos G, Kossyvakis C, et al. Radial artery flow mediated dilation predicts arterial spasm during transradial coronary interventions[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc In- terv, 2011, 77(5): 649.
  • 5Biondi - Zoccai flaG, Moretti C, Omed6 P, et al. Intra- arte- rial lidocaine versus saline to reduce periprocedural discomfort in patients undergoing percutaneous trans - radial or trans- ul- nar coronary procedures[J]. Aeta Cardiol, 2011, 66(1 ) :9.
  • 6Colus,si G L, lDi Fabio A, Catena C, et al. Involvement of en- dothelium- dependent and - independent mechanisms in mi- dazolam-induced vasodilation[J]. Hypertens Res, 2011, 34 (8) :929.
  • 7Gursoy S, Bagcivan I, Yildirim M K, et al. Vasorelaxant ef- fect of opioid analgesics on the isolated human radial artery[J ]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2006, 23(6): 496.

同被引文献29

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部