期刊文献+

实时荧光核酸恒温扩增检测技术在结核病诊断中的临床应用 被引量:14

Evaluation of the simultaneous amplification and testing for diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 评估实时荧光核酸恒温扩增检测技术(simultaneous amplification and testing,SAT)在结核病患者的痰液、体液及病灶组织等标本中检测结核分枝杆菌的价值.方法 收集在广州市胸科医院就诊的疑似结核病患者的痰液734份、体液标本94份(包括68份胸腔积液、21份脑脊液、5份关节积液,以下统称“体液”)及病灶组织标本76份,共计904份标本.同时采用SAT法、改良罗氏培养法进行检测,培养阳性者进行基因芯片菌种鉴定.SAT法与改良罗氏培养法结果不相符的标本,用结核分枝杆菌聚合酶链(polymerase chain reaction technology for Mycobacterium tuberculosis,PCR-TB)荧光诊断试剂盒进行检测.采用x2检验比较SAT法与改良罗氏培养法对结核病患者的阳性检出率.结果 以改良罗氏培养结果为金标准,则SAT法在痰液、体液、病灶组织标本的敏感度、特异度、符合率分别为90.20%(230/255)、92.48%(443/479)、91.69%(673/734);94.74%(18/19)、81.33%(61/75)、84.04%(79/94);100.00%(14/14)、77.42%(48/62)、81.58%(62/76).以扩大金标准(培养+PCR法)比对,则SAT法在痰液、体液、病灶组织标本的敏感度、特异度、符合率分别为96.30%(260/270)、99.35%(461/464)、98.23%(721/734);96.97%(32/33)、100.00%(61/61)、98.94%(93/94);100.00%(27/27)、97.96%(48/49)、98.68%(75/76).改良罗氏培养法和SAT法在痰液、体液、病灶组织标本的阳性检出率分别为34.74%(255/734)和36.24%(266/734)、20.21%(19/94)和34.04%(32/94)、18.42%(14/76)和36.84%(28/76);痰标本两者的阳性率比较,差异没有统计学意义(x2=0.36,P>0.05).体液与病灶组织标本中,SAT法较改良罗氏培养法的阳性率高出13.83%和18.42%,差异有统计学意义(x2值分别为4.55、6.44,P值均<0.05).结论 SAT法检测痰液、体液及病灶组织标本中的结核分枝杆菌,具有快速、敏感度和特异度较高的优点,可提高结核分枝杆菌的检出率. Objective To assess the clinical value of the isothermal RNA amplification assay (SAT) for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum,body fluid and nidus samples.Methods Seven hundred and thirtyfour sputum samples,94 samples of body fluid (including 68 thoracic effusion,21 cerebrospinal fluid and 5 joint effusion) and 76 nidus samples collected from suspected tuberculosis patients were tested by both SAT and L-J culture.The positive isolates were identified by Gene-chip method.The samples with different results between SAT and L-J culture were tested by Mycobacterium tuberculosis PCR (PCR-TB) fluorescence diagnosis kits.The detection rates of SAT and L-J culture were analyzed by Chi-square test.Results With the result of L-J culture as the reference,the sensitivity,the specificity and the coincidence rate of the sputum samples were 90.20% (30/255),92.48% (443/479) and 91.69% (673/734),those of the fluid samples were 94.74% (18/19),81.33% (61/75) and 84.04% (79/94),and those of the nidus samples were 100.00% (14/14),77.42% (48/62) and 81.58% (62/76).With the result of PCR-TB as the reference,the sensitivity,the specificity and the accordance rate of the sputum samples were 96.30% (260/270),99.35% (461/464) and 98.23% (721/734),those of the fluid samples were 96.97% (32/33),100.00% (61/61) and 98.94% (93/94),and those of the nidus samples were 100.00% (27/27),97.96% (48/49) and 98.68% (75/76).The detection rates the three different kinds of specimens by L-J culture and SAT were 34.74% (255/734) vs 36.24% (266/734),20.21% (19/94) vs 34.04% (32/94),18.42% (14/76) vs 36.84%(28/76).There was no difference in sputum samples between SAT and L-J culture (x2=0.36,P>0.05).However,there were significant differences in body fluids and nidus samples between SAT and L-J culture (x2=4.55 and 6.44,all P<0.05).Conclusion SAT is a rapid,sensitive and specific method for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in kinds of clinical samples.
出处 《中国防痨杂志》 CAS 2014年第6期458-461,共4页 Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis
关键词 结核/诊断 核酸扩增技术 敏感性与特异性 Tuberculosis/diagnosis Nucleic acid amplification techniques Sensitivity and specificity
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Rishi S,Sinha P, Malhotra B, et al. A comparative study for the detection of Mycobacteria by BACTEC MGIT 960, Lowenstein Jensen media and direct AFB smear examination. Indian J Med Microbil, 2007,25(4):383-386.
  • 2中国防痨协会基础专业委员会.结核病诊断实验室检验规程.北京:中国教育出版社,2006,46-51.
  • 3王黎霞,成诗明,陈明亭,赵雁林,张慧,姜世闻,何广学,吕青,杜昕,陈伟,刘小秋,阮云洲,王胜芬,夏愔愔,于兰,李峻,李雪,王宇,无.2010年全国第五次结核病流行病学抽样调查报告[J].中国防痨杂志,2012,34(8):485-508. 被引量:2441
  • 4张治国,欧喜超,孙倩,杜春英,高铁杰,赵雁林.利福平耐药实时荧光定量核酸扩增技术检测痰标本中结核分枝杆菌及其耐药性的研究[J].中国防痨杂志,2013,35(1):13-16. 被引量:96
  • 5Greco S, Rulli M, Girardi E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of in-house PCR for pulmonary tuberculosis in smear-positive patients:meta-analysis and metaregression. J Clin Microbiol, 2009, 47(3):569-576.
  • 6Sandin RL. Polymerase chain reaction and other amplification techniques in mycobacteriology. Clin Lab Med,1996,16(3):617-639.
  • 7Kearns AM, Freeman R, Steward M, et al. A rapid polymerase chain reaction technique for detecting M.tuberculisis in a variety of clinical specimens. J Clin Pathol,1998,51(12):922-924.
  • 8Suffys P, Palomino JC, Cardoso Leao S, et al.Evaluation of the polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In J Tuberc Lung Dis,2000,4(2):179-183.
  • 9Cui Z, Wang Y, Fang L, et al. Novel real-time simultaneous amplification and testing method to accurately and rapidly detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. In J Clin Microbiol, 2012,50(3):646-650.
  • 10倪丽丽,罗柳林,景玲杰,张军,陈晋.恒温扩增实时荧光检测技术在肺结核诊断中的临床价值[J].中华检验医学杂志,2012,35(8):702-705. 被引量:33

二级参考文献40

  • 1王易伟,钟敏,胡频频.rRNA扩增直接检测结核分枝杆菌的临床应用价值探讨[J].中华检验医学杂志,2005,28(5):543-544. 被引量:11
  • 2中华医学会结核病学分会.中国结核病分类法[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,1998,21(12):716-716.
  • 3赵雁林,尚美.我国结核病实验室诊断的现状[J].中华检验医学杂志,2007,30(7):725-728. 被引量:57
  • 4吴龙章,蔡杏珊,吴幸怡,黎燕琼,关玉华,关平,竺澎波.四种检测方法对结核病临床诊断价值的探讨[J].中华检验医学杂志,2007,30(7):742-745. 被引量:11
  • 5中华人民共和国卫生部.全国结核病耐药性基线调查报告(2007-2008年).北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:4.
  • 6Gamboa F, Manterold JM, Vinado B, et al. Direct detection of mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in nonrespiratory specimens by gen-probe amplified mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test[J].J Clin Microbiol, 1997,35( 1 ) :307-310.
  • 7中华人民共和国卫生部.WS288-2008肺结核诊断标准.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008.
  • 8中华人民共和国国家统计局.北京:中国统计年鉴2010.[M].中国统计出版社,2010.
  • 9Nakai H, Shimamura Y, Kanazawa T, et al. Determination of a new H+ -K+ ATPase inhibitor (E3810) and its four metabolites in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography [J]. J Chromatogr B Biomed Appl, 1994, 660(1):211.
  • 10Yasuda S, Ohnishi A, Ogawa T, et al. Pharmacokinetic properties of E3810, a new proton pump inhibitor, in healthy male volunteers [J].Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther, 1994,32(9) :466.

共引文献2665

同被引文献138

引证文献14

二级引证文献99

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部