期刊文献+

中晚期子宫颈鳞癌同步放化疗的疗效及预后因素分析 被引量:6

Outcomes and prognostic factors of advanced squamous cervical cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨中晚期子宫颈鳞癌患者同步放化疗的疗效及预后相关因素.方法 回顾性分析2007年1月至2008年12月在中国医学科学院肿瘤医院接受同步放化疗的172例Ⅱb~Ⅳ期子宫颈鳞癌患者的临床病理资料,均接受了体外放疗、腔内近距离放疗及以顺铂为基础的同步化疗.结果 172例患者的中位随访时间为54.5个月,2年总生存率(OS)和5年OS分别为81.5%和68.8%,2年无进展生存率(PFS)和5年PFS分别为69.2%和63.1%.单因素分析显示,影响OS的因素有肿瘤分期(Ⅱb期与Ⅲ期及以上,P<0.01)、局部肿瘤最大直径(≤4与>4 cm,P=0.001)、治疗前血清鳞状细胞癌抗原(SCC)水平(≤3与>3μg/L,P=0.001)、影像学腹膜后淋巴结转移情况(腹主动脉旁淋巴结阳性、仅盆腔淋巴结阳性与腹膜后淋巴结阴性,P<0.01)、血红蛋白含量(≤90、90 ~ 100与≥100 g/L,P=0.040).对PFS有显著影响的临床因素包括肿瘤分期(P<0.01)、局部肿瘤最大直径(P =0.003)、治疗前SCC水平(P =0.001)、影像学腹膜后淋巴结转移情况(P<0.01).多因素分析显示,Ⅲ期及以上(P =0.021,P=0.020)、局部肿瘤最大直径>4 cm(P=0.009,P=0.033)、治疗前SCC水平>3 μg/L(P =0.010,P =0.013)、影像学腹膜后淋巴结阳性(P =0.025,P=0.024)这4个因素是影响患者OS和PFS的独立不良因素,其中影像学腹主动脉旁淋巴结阳性(P=0.009,P=0.010)、仅盆腔淋巴结阳性(P=0.044,P=0.033)均为影响患者OS和PFS的独立不良因素.按预后不良因素数量将患者分为:无预后不良因素者(18例),有1个预后不良因素者(43例),有≥2个预后不良因素者(111例),无不良因素者与有1个不良因素者的OS、PFS分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),有≥2个不良因素者(2年、5年OS分别为73.1%、58.6%,2年、5年PFS分别为57.9%、50.0%)分别与前两者比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 Ⅲ期及以上、局部肿瘤最大直径>4 cm、治疗前SCC>3μg/L和影像学腹膜后淋巴结阳性是行同步放化疗的中晚期子宫颈鳞癌患者的独立预后不良因素,有≥2个不良因素的患者疗效较差. Objective To evaluate the outcomes and the prognostic factors for advanced squamous cervical cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).Methods Totally 172 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage Ⅱ b-Ⅳ who were treated in Cancer Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences between January 2007 and December 2008 were retrospectively analyzed.Patients were received external radiotherapy,high-dose rate brachytherapy and cisplatin-based chemotherapy concurrently.Results The median follow-up period was 54.5 months.The 2-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) were separately 81.5% and 68.8%.The 2-year and 5-year progress-free survival (PFS) were separately 69.2% and 63.1%.Using univariate analysis followed with multivariate analysis,the results showed that these clinicopathological factors including stage (Ⅲ and above versus Ⅱ b; P =0.021,HR =1.95 ; P =0.020,HR =1.86),maximum diameter of local tumor size (〉4 versus ≤4 cm; P =0.009,HR =2.55 ; P =0.033,HR =1.94),squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC) level before treatment (〉3 versus ≤3 μg/L; P =0.010,HR =2.47; P =0.013,HR =2.09) and retroperitoneal lymph node status on imaging (para-aortic lymph node positive versus negative,P =0.009,HR =3.00,P=0.010,HR =2.74; pelvic lymph node positive only versus negative,P =0.044,HR =1.98,P =0.033,HR =1.92) had the significant effect on OS and PFS.Patients with no above adverse prognostic factor were assigned to Group A (n =18),those with one factor were assigned to Group B (n =43),and those with no less than two factors were assigned to Group C (n =1 11).Among three groups,the 2-year OS were separately 94.1%,97.7% and 73.1%,the 5-year OS were separately 81.4%,90.1% and 58.6%,the 2-year PFS were separately 88.2%,90.4% and 57.9%,the 5-year PFS were 82.4%,87.9% and 50.0%.The results showed that group C was significant difference from Group A or B in OS and PFS (all P 〈 0.05),while Group A had no significant difference from Group B in OS and PFS (P 〉 0.05).Conclusions Stage Ⅲ or above,maximum diameter of local tumor size 〉 4 cm,SCC level 〉 3 μg/L before treatment and positive retroperitoneal lymph nodes on imaging are four independent adverse factors for prognosis of squamous cervical cancer of advanced stage after CCRT.The treatment of patients with no less than two adverse factors should be considered to be improved.
出处 《中华妇产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第5期348-354,共7页 Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
关键词 宫颈肿瘤 鳞状细胞 放射疗法 抗肿瘤联合化疗方案 预后 Uterine cervical neoplasms Carcinoma,squamous cell Radiotherapy Antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Vaccarella S, Lartet-Tieulent J, Plummer M, et al. Worldwide trends in cervical cancer incidence: impact of screening against changes in disease risk factors [ J]. Eur J Cancer, 2013, 49: 3262-3273.
  • 2Morris M, Eifel PJ, Lu J, et al. Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer[ J]. N Engl J Med, 1999, 340:1137- 1143.
  • 3Rose PG, Bundy BN, Watkins EB, et al. Coneurrent eisplatin- based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced eervieal cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 1999, 340:1144-1153.
  • 4Whitney CW, Sanse W, Bundy BN, et al. Randomized comparison of fluorouracil plus eisplatin versus hydroxyurea as an adjunct to radiation therapy in stage IIB-IVA carcinoma of the cervix with negative para-aortie lymph nodes: a Gynecologie Oncology Group and Southwest Oneology Group study [ J ]. J Clin Oneol, 1999, 17:1339-1348.
  • 5Duk JM, Groenier KH, de Bruijn HW, et al. Pretreatment serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen: a newly identified prognostic factor in early-stage cervical carcinoma [ J]. J Clin Oncol, 1996, 14:111-118.
  • 6Hong JH, Tsai CS, Chang JT, et al. The prognostic significance of pre- and posttreatment SCC levels in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix treated by radiotherapy [ J ]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1998, 41:823-830.
  • 7Olsen JR, Dehdashti F, Siegel BA, et al. Prognostic utility of squamous cell carcinoma antigen in carcinoma of the cervix: association with pre- and posttreatment FDG-PET [ J ]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2011, 81:772-777.
  • 8Liang JA, Chen SW, Chang WC, et al. Risk stratification for failure in patients with advanced cervical cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy: another way to optimise treatment results[J]. Clin Oncol (R Coil Radiol) , 2008, 20:683-690.
  • 9Tseng JY, Yen MS, Twu NF, et al. Prognostic nomogram for overall survival in stage IIB-IVA cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy [ J ]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 202 : 174.
  • 10Kim TE, Park B J, Kwack HS, et al. Outcomes and prognostic factors of cervical cancer after concurrent chemoradiation [ J ]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2012, 38:1315-1320.

二级参考文献15

  • 1孙立新,韩海琼,邵淑丽.918例Ⅰb期宫颈癌术后转移与复发分析[J].中国肿瘤临床,2004,31(11):651-652. 被引量:6
  • 2Ho CM, Chien TY, Huang SH, et al. Multivariate analysis of the prognostic factors and outcomes in early cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol, 2004, 93:458- 464.
  • 3Umezu T, Shibata K, Kajiyama H, et al. Prognostic factors in stage IA-HA cervical cancer patients treated surgically: does the waiting time to the operation affect survival? Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2012, 285:493- 497.
  • 4Jofiiska-Gmyrek J, Gmyrek L, Lindner B, et al. Progno6tic value of histopathology in cervical cancer patients. Ginekol Pol, 2010, 81:668-673.
  • 5Kitamura S, Miyazaki Y, Shinomura Y, et al. Peroxisome proliferatoractivated receptor gamma induces growth arrest and differentiation markers of human colon cancer cells[J]. Jpn J Cancer Res, 1999;90:75-80.
  • 6Sato H, Ishihara S, Kawashima K, et al. Expression ofperoxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)gamma in gastric cancer and inhibitory effects of PPAR gamma agonists[J]. Br J Cancer,2000; 83:1394-1400.
  • 7Heaney AP, Fernando M, Yong WH, et al. Functional PPAR-gamma receptor is a novel therapeutic target for ACTH-secreting pituitary adenomas[J]. Nat Med, 2002; 8:1281-1287.
  • 8Motomura W, Okumura T, Takahashi N, et al. Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma by troglitazone inhibits cell growth through the increase of p27KiP1 in human.Pancreatic carcinoma cells[J]. Cancer Res, 2000; 60:5558-5564.
  • 9Zander T, Kraus JA, Grommes C, et al. Induction of apoptosis in human and rat glioma by agonists of the nuclear receptor PPAR gamma[J]. J Neurochem, 2002; 81:1052-1060.
  • 10Kim E J, Park KS, Chung SY, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma activator 15-deoxy-deltal2,14-prostaglandin J2inhibits neuroblastoma cell growth through induction of apoptosis:association with extracellular signal-regulated kinase sign

共引文献7

同被引文献51

引证文献6

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部