期刊文献+

不同程度抑郁个体反事实思维性别差异的研究 被引量:3

Gender differences in counterfactual thinking in individuals with different depression states
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同程度抑郁个体反事实思维的性别差异。方法采用自我报告法、故事脚本法和反事实思维推理测验(counterfactual inference test,CIT)对正常对照组(n=60)、抑郁状态组(n=60)、抑郁患者组(n=60)进行测试(正常对照组、抑郁状态组根据BDI、SDS、HAMD量表得分筛选入组,抑郁患者组根据CCMD-3临床诊断入组),完成自发反事实思维、诱发反事实思维和CIT 3个试验任务,对自发和诱发反事实思维的数量、合理性及CIT得分进行评价。结果①在反事实思维数量方面,抑郁状态组中负性事件产生的自发反事实思维在数量上女性显著多于男性(P<0.05);②在反事实思维合理性方面,随着抑郁程度的增加,被试合理性逐渐降低。反事实思维合理性在性别上也无显著差异(P>0.05);③在CIT得分方面,随着被试抑郁程度的增加,CIT得分逐渐降低。CIT得分在性别上也无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论抑郁程度与反事实思维合理性和诱发反事实思维推理呈反比,抑郁状态的女性对负性事件产生的自发反事实思维数量多于男性。 Objective To investigate the gender differences in counterfactual thinking (CFT) produced by individuals with different depression states. Methods Totally 232 undergraduates from a university in Chongqing were surveyed by Beck depression inventory (BDI), self-rating depression scale (SDS) and Hamilton depression scale (HAMD). Then a total of 60 individuals with normal mental status (normal control) and 60 ones of depressive symptom (depressive symptom group) were recruited according to the results of the surveys. Another 60 depressed patients (depressed group) from psychiatric clinic of 2 hospitals in Chongqing were also enrolled. There were 30 males and 30 females in each group. No significant difference in baseline information was found among the 3 groups. The individuals of 3 groups were induced to produce spontaneous counterfactual thinking (SCFT) after recalling a negative event and induced counterfactual thinking (ICFT) after reading a story about a traffic event, then the individuals were demanded to complete the counterfactual inference test (CIT). The results produced by 180 testees were analyzed with the software SPSS 18.0. Results There were significantly more females producing CFT than males in the depressive symptom group (P〈0.05). The rationality of CFT was reduced with the depression states becoming worse. There was no obvious difference in rationality of CFT produced by different genders (P〉0.05). The scores of CIT was decreased with the severity of depression. No significant gender difference was found on the scores (P〉0.05). Conclusion Depression states are negatively proportional to the rationality of CFT and cued CIT. There are significantly more females than males who producing CFT in those individuals having depressive symptom after negative stimulation.
出处 《第三军医大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第11期1129-1132,共4页 Journal of Third Military Medical University
基金 军队心理卫生科研课题(12XLZ103) 军队医药卫生重点课题(BWS11J045)~~
关键词 抑郁 不同程度 反事实思维 性别差异 depression different states counterfactual thinking gender differences
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Roese N J, Olson J M. The structure of counterfactual thought [ J ]. Pers Soc Psychol Bull, 1993, 19(3) : 312 -319.
  • 2Gomez B M, Garcia-Monco J C, Astigarraga E, et al. Only spontane- ous counteffactual thinking is impaired in patients with prefrontal cortex lesions[J]. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, 2005, 24(3) : 723 -726.
  • 3仇云霞,张璐,桑青松.国内外反事实思维研究的现状与展望[J].大众科技,2011,13(3):134-135. 被引量:4
  • 4魏娟娟,冯正直,刘庆英,黄赛.抑郁症状大学生对正、负性生活事件的反事实思维研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2009,17(2):154-156. 被引量:6
  • 5Ebmeier K P, Donaghey C, Steele J D. Recent developments and cur- rent controversies in depression[ J ]. Lancet, 2006, 367 (955) : 153 - 167.
  • 6Koch K, Pauly K, Kellermann T, et al. Gender differences in the cogni- tive control of emotion: An fMRI study[ J ]. Neuropsychologia, 2007, 45 ( ! 2 ) : 2744 - 2754.
  • 7黄国权,余永强,王海宝.抑郁症性别差异的神经影像学研究进展[J].国际医学放射学杂志,2012,35(4):325-327. 被引量:5
  • 8刘平,舒良.贝克抑郁量表,自评抑郁量表,汉密顿抑郁量表和自尊量表[M]//汪向东,王希林,马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册.北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999:191-320.
  • 9段泉泉,胜利.焦虑及抑郁自评量表的临床效度[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2012,26(9):676-679. 被引量:3677
  • 10EI-Leithy S, Brown G P, Robbins I. Counterfactual thinking and posttraumatic stress reactions J]. J Abnorm Psychol, 2006, 115 (3) : 629 - 635.

二级参考文献94

  • 1温忠麟,侯杰泰,张雷.调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J].心理学报,2005,37(2):268-274. 被引量:3137
  • 2吴文源.焦虑自评量表[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1999,:235-238.
  • 3Kahneman D, Miller DT. Norm theory: Comparing reality to its ahernatives. Psychol Rev, 1986, 93(2):136-153
  • 4Roese NJ. Counterfactual thinking. Psychol Bull, 1997, 121 (1):133-148
  • 5Roese NJ. The functional basis of counterfactual thinking. J person-ality and Social Psychology, 1994, 66(5):805-818
  • 6Markman KD, McMullen MN, and Elizaga RA. Counterfactual thinking, persistence, and performance: A test of the Reflection and EvaluationModel. Experimental Social Psychology, 2008, 44(2):421-428
  • 7Marian GB, Cados Garia-Monco J, Elena A, et al. Only spontaneous counterfactual thinking is impaired in patients with prefrontal cortex lesion. Cognitive Brain Research, 2005, 24(3):723-726
  • 8Markman KD, Miller AK. Depression, control and counterfactual thinking: function for whom? J Social and Clinical Psychology, 2006, 25(2):210-227
  • 9Branscombe NR, Wohl MJA, Owen S, et al. Counterfactual thinking, blame assignment, and well-being in rape victims. Basicand Applied Social Psychology, 2003, 25(4):265-273
  • 10Sven IA, Birgitta H. Counterfactual ('if only') thinking in women with chronic widespread pain. Stress and Health, 2006, 22(2):121-129

共引文献3714

同被引文献35

引证文献3

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部