摘要
目的:观察吉西他滨( GEM)、奥沙利铂( OXA)联合重组人血管内皮抑素(恩度)一线治疗晚期胆系肿瘤(BTCs)的疗效及安全性。方法回顾性分析2009年1月至2013年8月ⅣB期BTCs患者48例,分为联合组(n=20)和单纯化疗组( n=28)。联合组:吉西他滨1000mg/m2静滴,d1、d8;奥沙利铂100mg/m2静滴 d2,3周为1周期;恩度15mg 静滴 d1~d14,3周为1周期。单纯化疗组仅给予GEMOX方案化疗,剂量与使用方法同联合组。2个周期后按照RECIST1.1标准评价近期疗效,参考KPS变化评价生活质量(QoL),根据NCI CTC3.0标准评价不良反应,并观察疾病进展时间(TTP)和总生存时间( OS)。结果联合组获CR 1例、PR 3例、SD 12例、PD 4例,有效率( RR)为20.0%,疾病控制率( DCR)为80.0%;中位TTP为8.6个月,中位OS为14.0个月;QoL改善稳定率为80.0%。单纯化疗组获 CR 1例、PR 5例、SD 15例、PD 7例,RR 为21.5%,DCR 为75.0%;中位TTP为6.0个月,中位OS为10.0个月;QoL改善稳定率为71.4%。两组中位TTP和OS的差异有统计学意义( P<0.05)。两组最常见的不良反应为骨髓抑制,其他不良反应包括恶心呕吐、肝功能损害、外周神经炎、皮肤过敏反应等,以1~2级为主,两组比较差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。化疗联合恩度组仅2例出现心电图T波改变,1例出现房性早搏,1例出现轻度血压升高。结论 GEMOX联合恩度方案一线治疗转移性BTCs疗效较好,可以改善或稳定QoL,延长生存时间,且耐受性较好,值得临床推广使用和进一步深入观察。
Objective To observe the efficacy and safety of endostar combined with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin as the first-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma. Methods Forty-eight patients from Jan. 2009 to Aug. 2013 confirmed with pathologic and imaging examination as stage ⅣB primary biliary tract carcinoma were reviewed. Twenty cases received endostar+GEMOX regimen and 28 cases were applied with GEMOX regimen alone. GEMOX regimen was given as follow:gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 iv, d1 ,d8;oxaliplatin 100mg/m2 iv, d2 , 21 days was a cycle. Endostar was given 15mg iv d1-d14 , 21 days was a cycle. The effica-cy was evaluated strictly after 2 cycles according to RECIST 1.1 criteria, quality of life(QoL)was evaluated accoding to karnofsky scores,safety was evaluated after 1 cycle according to NCI CTC 3.0 version criteria. The time to progress(TTP)and overall survival ( OS) were also observed. Results In GEMOX+endostar group, 1 was in CR,3 in PR,12 in SD, and 4 in PD; the response rate (RR)was 20.0%, disease control rate(DCR)was 80.0%; median TTP was 8.6 months and the median OS was 14.0 months; the QoL improved and stable rate was 80.0%. In GEMOX group, 1 was in CR,5 in PR,15 in SD, and 7 in PD; RR was 21.5%, and DCR was 75.0%; the median TTP was 6.0 months and the median OS was 10.0 months; the QoL improved and stable rate was 71.4%. There was statistical difference in TTP and OS between the two groups( P〈0.05) . The most common toxicity in the two groups were myelosuppression, other main toxicities included nause/vommiting, liver dysfaction, peripheral nearitis, skin allergy reaction and etc, mainly in grade 1-2, and there were no sugnificant differences between the two groups( P〈0.05) . In GEMOX+endostar group, on- ly 2 case of non-specific T wave changed. One case was of auricular flutter, and 1 case with mild hypertension. Conclusion GEMOX+endostar as the first-line treatment for advanced BTCs has good efficacy, may improve or stabilize the patient.s QoL and prolong surviv-al, and the toxicities are well-tolerated, which worth clinical use and further observation.
出处
《临床肿瘤学杂志》
CAS
2014年第5期430-434,共5页
Chinese Clinical Oncology