期刊文献+

低频超声增强万古霉素对导管表皮葡萄球菌生物被膜影响的体内实验

Effect of low-frequency ultrasound enhanced vancomycin on catheter Staphylococcs epidermidis biofilm in vivo
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨低频超声联合万古霉素对表皮葡萄球菌(S.epidermidis)RP62A生物被膜(biofi lm,BF)的影响。方法建立兔表皮葡萄球菌导管感染模型,设空白对照组,单独低频超声组,单独万古霉素组,低频超声联合万古霉素组。涂板菌落形成单位(colony-forming units,CFU)计数法计算导管细菌数;扫描电镜(scanning electron microscope,SEM)观察BF结构的改变;皮肤、心脏、肝脏及肾脏病理组织切片检查组织的炎症反应。结果单独低频超声对BF内细菌无杀灭作用,单独万古霉素能比较有效地杀灭BF内细菌,较空白对照组CFU减小,P<0.01;低频超声联合万古霉素组效果更加明显。SEM显示低频超声对BF结构无影响;与各单独作用组相比,低频超声联合万古霉素能明显地破坏BF,使其结构变得更加疏松。皮肤病理组织切片显示低频超声联合万古霉素组,皮下隧道炎症明显减轻。结论低频超声联合万古霉素能更显著地清除导管表皮葡萄球菌BF。 Objective To investigate the effect of low-frequency ultrasound combined with vancomycin on S. epidermidis RP62A strain's biofilm(BF). Methods Rabbit model of S. epidermidis catheter infection was established, including blank control group, low-frequency ultrasound alone group, vancomycin alone group and low- frequency ultrasound combined with vancomycin group. Coated plate colony forming units (CFU) counting method was used to calculate the number of bacteria on catheter; Changs in the structures of BF were observed by scanning electron microscope(SEM); pathology biopsy of skin, heart, liver and kidney to test tissue inflammation. Results Low-frequency ultrasound alone had no effect in killing BF bacteria. Vancomycin alone could eradicate BF bacteria more effectively. Compared with the control group, CFU decreased, P〈0.01; The effect of low-frequency ultrasound combined with vancomycin group was more obvious. SEM showed that the low-frequency ultrasound han no effect on the structure of BF. Compared with the alone groups, low-frequency ultrasound combined with vancomycin might significantly undermine BF, and made its structure became more loose. Conclusion Low-frequency ultrasound combined with vancomycin can more efficiently eradicate Staphylococcus epidermis BF on catheter.
出处 《中国抗生素杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第6期466-469,共4页 Chinese Journal of Antibiotics
基金 国家自然科学基金(编号:81070513 30901279 81370744) 教育部基金(编号:20135503110009) "十二五"国家科技支撑计划项目(编号:2012BAI04B05)
关键词 低频超声 万古霉素 表皮葡萄球菌 生物被膜 Low-frequency ultrasound Vancomycin Staphylococcus epidermidis Biofilm
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Mateo M,Maestre J R,Aguilar L,et al.Strong slime production is a marker of clinical significance in Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from intravascular catheters[J].Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis,2008,27(4):311-314.
  • 2Donlan R M,Costerton J W.Biofilms:survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms[J].Clin Microbiol Rev,2002,15(2):167-193.
  • 3Venkatesh M P,Placencia F,Weisman L E.Coagulase-negative staphylococcal infections in the neonate and child:an update [J].Semin Pediatr Infect Dis,2006,17(3):120-127.
  • 4Saginur R,StDenis M,Ferris W,et al.Multiple combination bactericidal testing of staphylococcal biofilms from implant-associated infections[J].Antimicrob Agents Chemother,2006,50(1):55-61.
  • 5郜向娜,余加林,芦起,刘立婷.四唑盐减低法结合激光共聚焦显微镜定量分析表皮葡萄球菌生物被膜体外模型[J].中国微生态学杂志,2010,22(12):1081-1084. 被引量:8
  • 6Borriello G,Werner E,Roe F,et al.Oxygen limitation contributes to antibiotic tolerance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in biofilms[J].Antimicrob Agents Chemother,2004,48(7):2659-2664.
  • 7Ensing G T,Roeder B L,Nelson J L,et al.Effect of pulsed ultrasound in combination with gentamicin on bacterial viability in biofilms on bone cements in vivo[J].J Appl Microbiol,2005,99(3):443-448.
  • 8Park D,Yoon J,Park J,et al.Transdermal drug delivery aided by an ultrasound contrast agent:An in vitro experimental study[J].Open Biomed Eng J,2010,11(4):56-62.
  • 9Carmen J C,Roeder B L,Nelson J L,et al.Ultrasonically enhanced vancomycin activity against Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms in vivo[J].J Biomater Appl,2004,18(4):237-245.
  • 10Dong Y,Chen S,Wang Z,et aL Synergy of ultrasound microbubbles and vancomycin against Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm[J].J Antimicob Chemoter,2013,68(4):816-826.

二级参考文献10

  • 1李京宝,韩峰,于文功.细菌生物膜研究技术[J].微生物学报,2007,47(3):558-561. 被引量:53
  • 2VUONG C, OTTO M. Staphylococcus epidermidis infections [ J ]. Microbes Infect,2002,4 (4) :481-489.
  • 3JAMES P,O'GARA. Ica and beyond: biofilm mechanisms and regulation in Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus [ J ]. FEMS Microbial Lett ,2007,270(2) : 179-188.
  • 4NNUO C, SILVIA M, FILIPE C, et al. Comparative assessment of antibiotic susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococci in biofilm versus planktonic culture as assessed by bacterial enumeration or rapid XTr colorimctry[ J]. J Antimicrob Chemother,2005,56 (2) :331-336.
  • 5DIETRICH M, ANGHARAD P D, LLINOS G H, et al. Microbial interaction in Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms [ J ]. Anal Bioanal Chemother,2007,387 (2) :399-408.
  • 6ROBIN K P, CHRISTINE A W, MELISSA J K, et al. Microplate alamar blue assay for Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm susceptibility testing [ J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother,2005,49 (7) :2612-2617.
  • 7MICHAEL O. Staphylococcus epiderrnidis the 'accidental' pathogen [J]. Nat Rev Microbiol,2009,7(8) :555-567.
  • 8GORDON R, KACY V W, BRIANL W, et al. Standardized method for in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida albican biofilms[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother,2001,45 (9) :2475-2479.
  • 9ELKE P, HANS J N, TOM C. Comparison of multiple methods for quantification of microbial biofilms grown in microtiter plates[ J]. J Microbiol Methods,2008,72(2) :157-162.
  • 10JULIAN W, WERNER M, ULRICH S. Heterogeity in biofilms [ J]. FEMS Microbiol Rev,2000,24 (5) :661-671.

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部