期刊文献+

磁共振表观弥散系数评估小鼠海马损伤程度的研究 被引量:1

A study on hippocampus injury assessment with apparent diffusion effect of MRI on mouse model
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 通过测量磁共振表观弥散系数来客观分析早期海马区颅脑损伤小鼠模型的脑损伤程度.方法 选用健康成年雄性C57/BL6小鼠18只,采用随机数字表法分为对照组、脑损伤轻型组和脑损伤重型组,每组小鼠数量为6只,后两组分别于头颅打击后6h,12 h和24 h对各组小鼠进行头颅MRI检查、弥散加权成像(DWI),选取海马作为兴趣区进行表观弥散系数(ADC)值的测量,比较兴趣区ADC值测量结果并进行统计学分析.结果 对照组两侧海马区ADC平均值分别为(8.65±0.26)×10^-4 mm2/s和(8.77±0.12) ×10^-4 mm2/s,二者比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).对照组、轻型组和重型组6 h ADC值分别为(8.70±0.50)×10^-4 mm2/s,(6.13±0.11)×10^-4 mm2/s和(3.16±0.78)×10^-4 mm2/s,12 h ADC值为(8.23±0.61)×10^-4 mm2/s,(5.92±0.27)×10^-4 mm2/s和(2.64±0.65)×10^-4 mm2/s; 24 h ADC值为(9.01 ±0.14)×10^-4mm2/s,(5.99±0.13)×10^-4 mm2/s和(2.58±0.42)×10^-4 mm2/s,三组间ADC值两两比较均差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 不同类型海马区脑外伤小鼠的ADC值存在差异,可以此来鉴别脑外伤的损伤程度,同时早期发现颅脑损伤. Objective To determine the utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values as an objective method of early detection of traumatic brain injury of the mice models in hippocampus injury.Methods A total of 18 healthy male adult C57/BL6 mice were randomly divided into three groups according to the degree of injury:the mild group,severe group and control group.Conventional images,diffusion-weighted images,ADC were studied.The hippocampal were selected as the interesting area.ADC values were calculated and compared with those in control subjects after 6 h,12 h and 24 h.Student t test was performed for each region to compare the injury groups and the control.Results In control group both sides hippocampal ADC values had no differences(8.65±0.26 and 8.77±0.12) ×10^-4 mm2/s,P〉0.05.Abnormalities were detected on ADC values,compared with conventional images in the injury groups.ADC values in mild group and severe group were significantly different from those of control group(6 h ADC values were (8.70±0.50) ×10^-4 mm2/s,(6.13± 0.11) ×10^-4 mm2/s,and (3.16±0.78) ×10^-4 mm2/s in control,mild and severe group respectively),(12 h ADC values (8.23±0.61)×10^-4 mm2/s,(5.92 ± 0.27) ×10^-4 mm2/s and (2.64±0.65) ×10^-4 mm2/s) and (24 h ADC values (9.01±0.14) ×10^-4 mm2/s,(5.99± 0.13)×10^-4 mm2/s and (2.58±0.42)×10^-4 mm2/s),P〈0.05.Conclusion There are differences among the ADC values on differcnt types of hippocampal brain injury mouse-model.ADC values can identify the degree of damage on brain injury and can detect early craniocerebral injury.
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第5期391-393,共3页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基金 天津市应用基础与前沿技术研究计划项目资助(13JCYBJC23800)
关键词 颅脑损伤 小鼠 磁共振扫描 表观弥散系数 定量检测 Traumatic brain injury Mice MRI Apparent diffusion coefficient Quantitative detection
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1王任直.尤曼斯神经外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009.
  • 2Fox GB, Fan L, Levasseur RA, et al. Sustained sensory/motor and cog-nitive deficits with neuronal apoptosis following controlled cortical im- pact brain injury in the mouse [ J]. J Neurotrauma, 1998,15 (8) :599- 614.
  • 3Vorhees CV, Williams MT. Morris water maze : procedures for assessing spatial and related forms of learning and memory [ J ]. Nat Protoc, 2006,1 (2) : 848-858.
  • 4Bohnen N, Jolles J, Twijnstra A. Neuropsychological deficits in pa- tients with persistent symptoms six months after mild head injury[ J]. Neurosurgery, 1992,30 ( 5 ) : 692-695.
  • 5Johnson DA,Wu T, Li P, et al. The effect of steroid sulfatase inhibi- tion on learning and spatial memory [ J ]. Brain Res, 2000,865 (2) : 286-290.
  • 6Talpos JC, Dias R, Bussey TJ, et al. Hippocampal lesions in rats im- pair learning and memory for locations on a touch-sensitive computer screen:the "ASAT" task[ J]. Behav Brain Res, 2008,192(2) :216- 225.
  • 7Both M, Bahner F, yon Bohlen, et al. Propagation of specific network patterns through the mouse hippocampus [ J ]. Hippocampus, 2008,18 (9) :899-908.
  • 8Glass TF, Reeves B, Sharp FR. Modeling both the mechanical and hy- poxic features of traumatic brain injury in vitro in rats [ J ]. Neurosci Lett,2002,328(2) : 133-136.
  • 9Alder J, Fujioka W, Lifshitz J, et al. Lateral fluid percussion : model of traumatic brain injury in mice[ J]. J Vis Exn. 2011 (54), 121-127.
  • 10杨灿,王高华,王惠玲,刘忠纯,朱志先,刘浩,郭鑫,郭俊慧.慢性应激及再次应激后大鼠行为与海马tau蛋白的改变[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2013,22(9):784-787. 被引量:8

二级参考文献38

  • 1Wuwongse S, Chang RC, Law AC. The putative neurodegenerative links between depression and Alzheimer' s disease. Prog Neurobiol, 2010,91:362-375.
  • 2Wang JZ, Liu F. Microtubule-associated protein tau in development, degeneration and protection of neurons. Prog Neurobiol, 2008,85: 148-175.
  • 3Bianchi M, Hagan JJ, Heidbreder CA. Neuronal plasticity, stress and depression : involvement of the cytoskeletal microtubular system Curt. Drug Targets CNS Neurol Disord,2005 ,4 :597-611.
  • 4Surget A, Saxe M, Leman S, et al. Drug-dependent requirement of hip- poeampal neurogenesis in a model of depression and of antidepressant reversal. Biol Psychiatry,2008,64:293-301.
  • 5Caccia S, Cappi M, Fracasso C, et al. Influence of dose and route of administration on the kinetics of fluoxetine and its metabolite norfluox- etine in the rat. Psychopharmaeology, 1990,100:509-514.
  • 6Anthony JP, Sexton TJ, Neumaier JF. Antidepressant-induced regula- tion of 5-HT (1 b) mRNA in rat dorsal raphe nucleus reverses rapidly after dru discontinuation. J Neurosci Res.2000,61:82-87.
  • 7Byers AL,Yaffe K. Depression and risk of developing dementia, Nat Rev Neurol,2011,7 :323-331.
  • 8Dal Forno G, Palermo MT, Donohue JE, et al. Depressive symptoms, sex, and risk for Alzheimer'S disease. Ann Neurol,2005 ,57 :381-387.
  • 9Dotson VM, Beydoun MA, Zonderman AB. Recurrent depressive symptoms and the incidence of dementia and mild cognitive impair- ment. Neurology ,2010,75:27-34.
  • 10Gatz JL, Tyas SL, St John P, et al. Do depressive symptoms predict Alzheimer's disease and dementia? J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sei, 2005,60:744-747.

共引文献22

同被引文献12

  • 1Nathoo N, Yong VW, Dunn JF. Understanding disease processes in muhiple sclerosis through magnetic resonance imaging studies in ani- mal models [J].Neuroimage Clin ,2014,4:745-756.
  • 2Roychowdhury S, Maldjian JA, Grossman RI. Multiple sclerosis : com- parison of trace apparent diffusion coefficients with MR enhancement pattern of lesions [ J ].AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2000,21 ( 5 ) :869-874.
  • 3Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, et al. Diagnostic criteria for mul- tiple sclerosis : 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria [ J ]. Ann Neu- rol, 2011,69 (2) : 292-302.
  • 4Guttmann CR ,Ahn SS, Hsu L ,et al.The evolution of multiple sclerosis lesions on serial MR[J] .Am J Neuroradiol 1995,16(7) :1481-1491.
  • 5Petrella JR, Grossman RI, McGowan JC, et al. Multiple sclerosis le- sions: relationship between MR. enhancement pattern and magnetization transfer effect[ J] .Am J Neuroradiol, 1996,17(6) : 1041-1049.
  • 6Gratsias G, Kapsalaki E, Kogia S, et al. A quantitative evaluation of damage in normal appearing white matter in patients with multiple sclerosis using diffusion tensor MR imaging at 3T [ J ]. Acta Neurol Bele,2014,115(2) :111-116.
  • 7Koelblinger C, Fruehwald-Pallamar J, Kubin K, et al. Atypical idio- pathic inflammatory demyelinating lesions (IIDL) : Conventional and diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) findings in 42 cases[ J] .Eur J Radiol, 2013,82 ( 11 ) : 1996-2004.
  • 8Tievsky AL, Ptak T, Farkas J.Investigation of apparent diffusion coeffi- cient and diffusion tensor anisotropy in acute and chronic multiple sclerosis lesions[ J] .Am J Neuroradiol, 1999,20(8) : 1491-1499.
  • 9van der Valk P, De Groot CJ. Staging of multiple sclerosis (MS) le- sions:pathology of the time frame of MS[ J ].Neuropathol Appl Neuro- bio1,2000,26 ( 1 ) :2-10.
  • 10Balashov KE, Lindzen E. Acute demyelinating lesions with restricted diffusion in multiple sclerosis [ J ]. Mult Scler, 2012, 18 ( 12 ) : 1745- 1753.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部