大学生休闲满意度对应激和抑郁影响的路径分析

Effects of leisure satisfaction on stress and depression of undergraduates： a path analysis

目的 考察大学生休闲满意度与应激及抑郁的路径关系.方法 采用分层整群取样法抽取的1 000名大学生填写了大学生休闲满意度问卷、青少年生活事件量表、自评抑郁量表与基本信息调查表;采用积差相关分析与结构方程建模法对数据进行了统计分析.结果 休闲满意度总分[（3.63±0.78）分]对应激（β=-0.30,t=-8.81）及抑郁（β=-0.05,t1=-5.69,t2=7.54）均有显著负向预测作用;休闲放松满意度得分[（3.80±0.89）分]既可以直接影响抑郁（β=-0.18,t=-3.28）也可以通过应激间接影响抑郁（β=-0.06,t1=-6.53,t2=7.28）,休闲交往满意度得分[（3.51±0.82）分]对抑郁及应激均无明显作用（t＜2）,而休闲超越满意度得分[（3.56±0.85）分]仅直接影响抑郁（β=-0.15,t=-2.75）而对应激无明显作用（t＜2）.结论 大学生休闲满意度的不同维度对应激及抑郁的影响路径不同.

Objective To explore the relationship among different dimensions of leisure satisfaction,stress and depression of Chinese undergraduates.Methods A stratified sample of 1 000 undergraduates completed the Leisure Satisfaction Questionnaire of College Students （LSQ）,Adolescent Self-Rating Life Check List （ASLEC）,Self-Rating Depression Scale （SDS）,and the basic information questionnaire.The data was analyzed by methods of Pearson＇ s product-moment correlation and structural equation modeling.Results Firstly,total score of LSQ （3.63 ±0.78） had significant effect on depression（β=-0.30,t=-8.81＞2）,and it＇ s indirect effect on depression buffered by stress was also significant（β=-0.05,t 1 =-5.69,t2 =7.54）.Secondly,in the three dimensions of LSQ,satisfaction of leisure relaxation（3.80±0.89） had both significant main effect（β=-0.18,t=-3.28） and indirect effect buffered by stress （β=-0.06,t1 =-6.53,t 2 =7.28） on depression,while satisfaction of leisure contact （3.51 ±0.82） had neither main effect nor indirect effect buffered by stress on depression significantly（t ＜2）.And satisfaction of leisure transcendence （3.56 ± 0.85） had significant main effect （β =-0.15,t =-2.75） but no indirect effect buffered by stress on depression.Conclusion The impact paths to stress and depression were distinguished between the three dimensions of leisure satisfaction of Chinese undergraduates.