期刊文献+

高职商务英语校内实训教学动态评价体系构建

The Construction of Dynamic Assessment System in Intramural Practice Training for Departments of Business English
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前,针对高职高专院校商务英语专业的校内实训教学,评价体系仍停留在静态评价体系层面。静态评价体系操作主体局限于教师,操作过程未重视受教者发展潜能,评价结果不利于学科建设。针对以上评价体系缺陷,本文介绍了以"最近发展区"为核心理论的动态评价体系,以"渐进提示评价模式"为基础,提出商务英语专业校内实训教学评价体系应立足于受教者发展潜能、促进学科后续发展。 In the vocational colleges, most departments of Business English offer intramural practice training nowadays with the aim of improving students’ practical skills in Business English. However, the static assessment system that is being adopted has its setbacks in the fields of evaluating operator, evaluating process and evaluating results. This article introduces the system of dynamic assessment which is based on the theory of“Zone of Proximal Development”. With the approach of “Graduated Prompting Assessment”, this article aims to construct a dynamic assessment system which directs at the intramural practice training for department of Business English.
作者 王纯蕊
出处 《三门峡职业技术学院学报》 2014年第2期34-36,39,共4页 Journal of Sanmenxia Polytechnic
关键词 商务英语 校内实训评价 动态评价 渐进提示评价模式 Business English Intramural practice training Dynamic assessment system Graduated prompting assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献47

  • 1潘玉耕.校企合作中的文化融合问题[J].烟台职业学院学报,2010,16(4):1-4. 被引量:6
  • 2周天赐.动态评量:发展与改进儿童学习潜能的媒介式学习[M].台湾心理出版社,1999年..
  • 3Ableeva, R. 2008. Listening Comprehension in Foreign Language Instruction (CALPER Professional development Document 0810) [Z]. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University, Center for Advanced Language Proficiency Education and Research.
  • 4Anton, M. 2003. Dynamic assessment of advanced foreign language learners [R]. Paper presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Washington D. C., March 2003.
  • 5Brown, A. & R. Ferrara. 1985. Diagnosing zones of proximal development [A]. In J. Wertsch (ed.). Culture, Communication and Cognition. Vygotskian Perspectives [C]. Cambridge. CUP. 273-305.
  • 6Buchel, F. & U. Scharnhorst. 1993. The Learning Potential Assessment Device (LPAD) : Discussion of theoretical and methodological problems [A]. In J. Hamers, K. Sijtsma & A. Ruijssenaars ( eds. ) . Learning Potential Assessment : Theoretical, Methodological and Practical Issues[C]. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger. 83-111.
  • 7Calero, M. & E. Navarro. 2004. Relationship between plasticity, mild cognitive impairment and cognitive decline [J]. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 19 : 653-660.
  • 8Elkonin, D. 1998. Epilogue. The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 5. Child Psychology [M]. New York: Plenum.
  • 9Feuerstein, R., Y. Rand&M. Hoffman. 1979. The Dynamic Assessment of Retarded Performers: The Learning Potential Assessment Device, Theory, Instruments, and Techniques [M]. Baltimore: University Park Press.
  • 10Feuerstein, R., Y. Rand&J. Rynders. 1988. Don't Accept Me as I Am. Helping Retarded Performers Excel [M] New York: Plenum.

共引文献227

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部