期刊文献+

论最高人民检察院司法解释的实质合理性 被引量:1

On Substantive Rationality of the Supereme People's Procuratorate's Judicial Interpretation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 最高人民检察院在司法实践中根据检察工作的实际需要不间断地制定司法解释,对检察工作中具体应用法律问题进行解释,为我国法治建设、社会治理做出了应有的贡献。最高人民检察院司法解释的合理性为保障法律统一、正确适用发挥法律监督作用;为填补法律条文的不完善作了积极贡献;为解决司法中新情况新问题提供司法依据等。这些合理性因素充分体现了最高人民检察院司法解释的价值所在。面对当前学界和社会部分人士对最高人民检察院司法解释的实质合理性的种种质疑,需要从检察价值合理性、检察目的合理性、检察实践合理性三方面进行论证,以期待人们正确认识最高人民检察院司法解释的实质合理性。 The Supreme People' s Procuratorate in judicial practice according to the actual need of procuratorial work uninterrupted development of the judicial interpretation, the interpretation of the specific application of law issues in the procuratorial work, making contribution to the construction of rule of law in China, social governance. The Supreme People's Procuratorate rationality judicial interpretation for uniform law, correctly apply the function of legal supervision; making a positive contribution to fill the legal provisions is not perfect; provide legal basis for solving the new problems appearing in the judicial. These reasonable factors fully embodies the Supreme People' s Procuratorate judicial interpretation of the value, as the "ruling the country by law, building a socialist country ruled by law" has made the contribution. In the face of the current academic and social parts of the Supreme People's Procuratorate judicial interpretation of the substantive rationality of all sorts of questions, the author from the value rationality, the rationality of purpose, the three aspects of practice rationality contradicts, expect people to the correct understanding of the Supreme People' s judicial interpretation of the substantive rationality.
作者 黄硕
出处 《政法论丛》 CSSCI 2014年第3期112-119,共8页 Journal of Political Science and Law
关键词 合理性 司法解释 检察价值 检察目的 检察实践 rationality judicial interpretation the judicial prosecution value the purpose of judicial review the procuratorial practice
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献57

  • 1张明楷.也论用拾得的信用卡在ATM机上取款的行为性质——与刘明祥教授商榷[J].清华法学,2008,2(1):91-108. 被引量:117
  • 2刘明祥.用拾得的信用卡在ATM机上取款行为之定性[J].清华法学,2007,1(4):22-28. 被引量:67
  • 3张明楷.盗窃与抢夺的界限[J].法学家,2006(2):119-131. 被引量:167
  • 4[德]Claus Roxin.《德国刑事诉讼法》,吴丽琪译,台湾三民书局1998年版,第646页以下.
  • 5林东茂.“诈欺或窃盗-一个案例的探讨”[J].刑事法杂志,:54-54.
  • 6[日]前田稚英.《刑法各论讲义》,东京大学出版会2007年版,页214.
  • 7Vgl. , Wessels/Hillenkamp, Strafrecht Besonderer Teil/2,23. Aufl. , C. F. MOiler 2000, S. 51.
  • 8樊文.“对‘T恶意利用ATM机故障恶意取款案’理论和实务处理上的再分析”,http://www.iolaw.org.cn/showArticle.asp?id=2271.
  • 9邓子滨.“许霆案重审的几个关键”,载谢望原,付立庆主编.《许霆案深层解读》,中国人民公安大学出版社2008年版,页262-263.
  • 10敏华.“‘许霆取款案’专家直指银行滥用公众权力”,http://www.ycwb.com/ycwb/2007-12/24/content_1732211.htm.

共引文献141

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部