期刊文献+

有限频率线性理论的波恩近似佯谬 被引量:1

Born approximation paradox of linear finite-frequency theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对有限频率层析成像线性理论的波恩近似问题进行梳理,用数值方法统计分析其适用范围,结果表明波恩近似要求最大速度扰动不超过1%;然后对相关走时一阶近似进行统计分析,结果表明它也只适用于最大速度扰动在1%以内的情形.然而,结合波恩近似和相关走时一阶近似而得到的有限频率线性理论,其适用的速度扰动范围最大可达10%.这个表面上的逻辑悖论,称为"波恩近似佯谬".此佯谬是由于不恰当地使用波恩近似造成的.本文摒弃波恩近似,使用泛函的Fréchet微分和隐函数定理推导得到有限频率线性理论,圆满解释了波恩近似佯谬.由于有限频率非线性理论早已摒弃了波恩近似,因此波恩近似概念在有限频率层析成像理论中完全没有必要. After reviewing the Born approximation problem of linear finite-frequency tomography theory,its scope of application is statistically analyzed by numerical method.The result indicates that the maximum velocity perturbation should not exceed 1% for Born approximation.Then the statistical analyses on the first-order approximation of cross-correlation travel-time also show that it only meets the case of the maximum velocity perturbation less than 1%.However,the maximum velocity perturbation can be 10% for linear finite-frequency theory,which combines Born approximation with the first-order approximation of cross-correlation travel-time.This apparent logic paradox is called "Born ap proximation paradox",which is caused by misusage of Born approximation.Thus,Born approximation is discarded in this study; Fréchet derivative and implicit functional theorem are used to deduce linear finite-frequency theory.As a result,Born approximation paradox is explained thoroughly.Since Born approximation has been discarded early in nonlinear finite-frequency theory,this concept is unnecessary in finite-frequency tomography theory.
作者 江燕 陈晓非
出处 《地震学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第3期372-389,531,共18页 Acta Seismologica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金(41090292) 中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(DQJB13B15)共同资助
关键词 有限频率层析成像 波恩近似 相关走时 Fréchet微分 隐函数定理 finite-frequency tomography Born approximation cross-correlation traveltime Fréchet derivative implicit function theorem
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1Aki K,Richards P G.1980.Quantitative Seismology:Theory and Methods[M] .San Francisco:W H Freeman and Company:721-751.
  • 2Baig A M,Dahlen F A.2004.Statistics of traveltimes and amplitudes in random media[J] .Geophys J Int,158(1):187-210.
  • 3Baig A M,Dahlen F A,Hung S H.2003.Traveltimes of waves in three-dimensional random media[J] .Geophys J Int,153(2):467-482.
  • 4Bezada M J,Levander A,Schmandt B.2010.Subduction in the southern Caribbean:Images from finite-frequency P wave tomography[J] .J Geophys Res,115(B12):B12333.doi:10.1029/2010JB007682.
  • 5Chen P,Zhao L,Jordan T H.2007.Full 3D tomography for the crustal structure of the Los Angeles region[J] .Bull Seismol Soc Am,97(4):1094-1120.
  • 6Coates R T,Chapman C H.1990.Ray perturbation theory and the Born approximation[J] .Geophys J Int,100 (3):379-392.
  • 7Dahlen F A,Baig A M.2002.Fréchet kernels for body wave amplitudes[J] .Geophys J Int,150(2):440-466.
  • 8Dahlen F A,Hung S H,Nolet G.2000.Fréchet kernels for finite-frequency traveltimes:I.Theory[J] .Geophys J Int,141(1):157-174.
  • 9Fichtner A,Kennett B L N,Igel H,Bunge H P.2008.Theoretical background for continental-and global-scale full-waveform inversion in the time-frequency domain[J] .Geophys J Int,175(2):665-685.
  • 10Fichtner A,Kennett B L N,Igel H,Bunge H P.2010.Full waveform tomography for radially anisotropic structure:New insights into present and past states of the Australasian upper mantle[J] .Earth Planet Sci Lett,290(3/4):270-280.

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部