期刊文献+

小切口椎旁肌间隙入路、短节段椎弓根螺钉固定治疗胸腰段骨折的临床研究 被引量:6

The clinical effects of short-segment pedicle screw fixation in treating thoracolumbar fractures via less invasive paraspinal intermuscular approach
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨小切口椎旁肌间隙入路、短节段椎弓根螺钉固定治疗胸腰段骨折的临床疗效。方法选择2012年1月—2013年3月期间本院诊治的80例胸腰段骨折患者为研究对象,根据手术方法不同分为A组(38例)及B组(42例),两组分别行传统入路或小切口椎旁肌间隙入路、短节段椎弓根螺钉固定治疗。比较两组临床疗效及手术效果的差别。结果 B组手术出血量、手术时间及术后VAS评分均显著优于A组(P〈0.05);随访7~27月,A组末次随访伤椎前缘压缩比、伤椎矢状面Cobb角及椎管占位率分别为91.93±3.65%、4.37±1.62°和6.87±0.63,B组分别为91.78±3.58%、4.40±1.65°和6.90±0.69%,差别无统计学意义(均P>0.05);所有患者均获得骨性愈合,未出现螺钉断裂及骨折复位丢失。结论小切口椎旁肌间隙入路、短节段椎弓根螺钉固定治疗胸腰段骨折临床疗效确切,对机体损伤小,有利于术后恢复。 Objective To understand the clinical effects of short-segment pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures via less invasive paraspinal intermuscular approach. Method 80 patients with thoracolumbar fractures admitted to the hospital from January 2012 to March 2013 were taken as subjects of study. 38 of them constituted the control group,while the other 42 were treated as the experimental group. The control group were treated with traditional approach,while the experimental group with the less invasive paraspinal intermuscular approach combined with shortsegment pedicle screw fixation. Both the clinical effect and operation effects on the two groups were compared. Findings Intraoperative blood loss,operation time and VAS scores after operation observed of the experimental group were superior to those of the control group A( P 0. 05). The follow-up period for all the cases was in the range of 7 to 27 months. At Thefinal follow-up,the fractured vertebra height compression ratio,the Cobb's angle on sagittal plane and spinal canal occupational ratio in the experimental group were 91. 93 ± 3. 65%,4. 37 ± 1. 62°and 6. 87 ± 0. 63 in the control group,and 91. 78 ± 3. 58%,4. 40 ± 1. 65° and 6. 90 ± 0. 69% in the experimental group( P 0. 05); Bone union was achieved in both groups without breakage of screw and second loss of reduction. Conclusion Short-segment pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures via less invasive paraspinal intermuscular approach have obvious curative effects, less injure and significantly contribute to recovery.
出处 《健康研究》 CAS 2014年第3期277-279,共3页 Health Research
关键词 骨折 胸椎 腰椎 手术入路 fracture thoracic spine lumbar vertebrae surgical approach
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献44

  • 1杨操,杨述华,王洪,孟春庆,邵增务,肖宝钧.USS复位内固定结合经椎弓根植骨治疗胸腰椎爆裂性骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2005,7(6):537-540. 被引量:49
  • 2王向阳,戴力扬,徐华梓,池永龙,蒋盛旦,李新锋.胸腰椎不同程度前中柱骨折内固定后的生物力学特征及前路重建的意义[J].中华创伤杂志,2006,22(3):214-217. 被引量:21
  • 3袁强,田伟,张贵林,刘波,行勇刚,李勤,胡临,李志宇.骨折椎垂直应力螺钉在胸腰椎骨折中的应用[J].中华骨科杂志,2006,26(4):217-222. 被引量:306
  • 4杜心如,赵玲秀,石继川,孔祥玉.经伤椎椎弓根螺钉复位治疗胸腰椎爆裂骨折的临床解剖学研究[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2007,25(3):239-242. 被引量:90
  • 5Kifune M, Panjabi MM, Liu W, et al. Functional morphology of the spinal canal after endplate, wedge, and burst fractures [ J ]. J Spinal Disord, 1997,10:457 - 466.
  • 6Daniaux H. Technik and erste ergebnisseder tran pedikularen spangiosaplastik beiklom pressons bruechen imlenden wirberlsaeulen bereicn[ J ]. Acta Chir Ausfiaca, 1982,43:79 - 82.
  • 7Ebelkeg DK, Asher MA, Nef JR, et al. Survivorship analysis of VSP spine instrumentation in the treatment of thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures [J]. Spine, 1991, 16:428 - 432.
  • 8McLain FR,Sparling E, Benson RD. Early failure of short-segment pedicle instrumentation for thoracolumbar burst fractures: a preliminary report[ J]. J Bone Joint Surg( Am), 1993,75:162 - 167.
  • 9Alanay A, Acaroglu E, Yazici M,et al. Short-segment pedicle intrumentation of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Does transpedieular intracorporeal grafting prevent early failure [J]. Spine, 2001,26 : 213 - 217.
  • 10Schwender JD,Holly LT,Rouben DP,et al.Minimally invasivetransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion technical feasibility and ini-tial results[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2005,18:16.

共引文献152

同被引文献72

  • 1张毅,钟德君.肌间隙入路结合伤椎置钉治疗胸腰段骨折34例分析[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(33):366-366. 被引量:1
  • 2李文生,陈永峰.椎旁肌间隙入路在治疗胸腰段骨折中的应用[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(17):140-140. 被引量:2
  • 3Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H .Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. A histologic and enzymaticanalysis. Spine. 1996;21 (8):941-944.
  • 4Wiltse LL, Bateman JG, Hutchinson RH, et al. The paraspina sacrospinalis- splitting approach to the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am.1968;50: 919-926.
  • 5吐尔洪江·吐尔迪,伍政疆.经肌间隙入路与正中常规切口入路植椎弓根钉治疗胸腰段骨折比较研究[J].中国保健营养(中旬刊),2013,23(8):157-157.
  • 6Talebian S, Hosseini M, Bagheri H, et al. Trunk muscle fatigue in subjects with a history of low back pain and a group of healthy controls measured by similarily index. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2011 ;24:17-22.
  • 7Kawaguchi , Yabuki S, Styf J, et al. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Topographic evaluation of intramuscular pressure and blood flow in the porcine back muscle during surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21: 2683-2688.
  • 8戴胡明,夏睿,杨家赵,等.椎旁肌间隙入路和传统后正中入路在治疗胸腰段骨折对比研究[C].//安徽省医学会骨科学第十三次学术会议论文集.2012:254.257.
  • 9Jiang XZ., Tian W, Liu B, et al. Comparison of a paraspinal approach with a percutaneous approach in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures with posterior ligamentous complex injury: a prospective randomized controlled trial.J int Med Res. 2012;40(4):1343-1356.
  • 10那孟奇.Wiltse肌间隙入路与传统后正中入路在治疗胸腰段骨折的比较研究[J].右江民族医学院学报,2011,33(2):145-147. 被引量:11

引证文献6

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部